English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Someone just asked a legitamate question about a belief system that was not of the mainstream.

The immediate reaction from some was to insinuate that this person is on drugs.

Can someone please epxlain how this is assumption makes sense?

I do not assume that illogical mystics who have beliefs in popular religions are on drugs, why would I assume an illogical mystic of an less than popular religion is on drugs?

At least what she wanted was something admirable, which is more than I can say for a lot of believers, who just want a God so they can tell themselves God will punish people they don't like.

2006-12-31 13:34:09 · 6 answers · asked by socialdeevolution 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

6 answers

this is not an assumption but more along the manner of slander as the politicians sling mud in order to supposedly discredit the person and hence the viewpoint espoused. It works for ignorant people . if you report this they will be deleted but I prefer your confrontational method as more effective in more ways then stooping to censorship by community guidelines .these unacceptable methods should be exposed as what they really are . thanks for your question.
peaceout

2006-12-31 13:43:05 · answer #1 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 1 0

When a person asks a question on here there are always going to be good responses and bad ones.

2006-12-31 21:39:01 · answer #2 · answered by tas211 6 · 2 0

Don't do drugs mmmmkay. Drugs are bad mmmmmkay.

2006-12-31 21:37:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I hear that belief is more glorious on drugs.

2006-12-31 21:41:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

The beast has the name of "intolerance" and feeds on ignorance, doubt, and fear.

2006-12-31 22:16:37 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

because ppl r jerks.

2006-12-31 21:37:53 · answer #6 · answered by EMMY 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers