He appears more corrupt than I had ever noticed. Is he going to hell?
2006-12-31 11:42:42 · 15 answers · asked by Sobekk 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I don't know about evil, but he sure is embarrassing.
2006-12-31 11:44:21 · answer #1 · answered by saopaco 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
From Wikpedia ...."In most cultures, the word is used to describe acts, thoughts, and ideas which are thought to (either directly or causally) bring about affliction and death."
Considering that Pat Robertson proposed assassinating Hugo Chavez, I would say yes. That alone fulfills the definition of evil.
2006-12-31 11:49:57 · answer #2 · answered by Sketch 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, Pat Robertson will not go to Hell, there is no Hell and there are no gods. He is a stinking fraud thief and deserves a prison cell where he can count the number of times his cellmate rapes him.
2006-12-31 11:55:34 · answer #3 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think true christians need to rise up against the evil that is done in the name of their religion. Pat robertson and his ilk are pure evil, and are intent on spreading hatred and intolerence, and returning america to the dark ages.
2006-12-31 11:45:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pat Robertson is one of the leaders of Evangelical Christianity. He has let his position ''go to his head''. He gets worse and worse with time. He is certainly no one I would want to spend time in heaven with.
If I were one of these Christians, I'd try to get rid of him. He is embarrassing.
2006-12-31 11:49:02 · answer #5 · answered by Shossi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he certainly deserves to. From the taking of money to make him rich at the expense of the poor little old ladies on Social Security to the stupid stuff he says. That man is corrupt.
2006-12-31 11:45:48 · answer #6 · answered by Ruth 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe he will go to hell. He insults Hindus because to him they're evil and they worship false gods. He is a crazy man.
2006-12-31 13:00:46 · answer #7 · answered by cynical 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please don't ask people to do God's job for him; he is quite able to judge without our help, thank you.
I've never heard anything that would indicate he's done anything illegal, but then again I don't watch a whole lot of tv, either. Why?
2006-12-31 11:46:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not his judge, or anyone elses', but as far as I'm concerned all televangelists are pretty much evil.
2006-12-31 11:46:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
'Evil' is a strong term. I would say 'mistaken,' 'heretical,' 'dellusional,' and 'dangerous,' but I can't judge his intentions or his eternal destiny.
2006-12-31 11:46:37 · answer #10 · answered by NONAME 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋