Yes I agree. Considering the fact that the sayings of the prophet are biased and were written down centuries after his death. The oral transmission of the Ahadeeth have been corrupted by people who claim that a saying is from the prophet, when really there is no way to prove it. You also have to consider the fact that majority of things that the Prophet said and did were influenced greatly by the geo-political circumstances of the time. So one thing that might have applied in 7th century Medina may not apply in todays world.
Also the word of God is the Quran and that is what Islam should take its teachings from. These days it seems people spit out the so called Ahadeeth here and there with out considering what the Quran has to say. I admit there are some Ahadeeth that could hold weight, such as the ones that prescribe Prayer and what not. But the ones that are used by Muslim Legal Jurists need to be re-evaluated by todays standards.
2006-12-31 11:22:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sui Generis 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, I am not really sure when the Hadith was compilled all together
but see Sunnah explains the Quran, therefore it is highly needed, through it there are a lot of laws..
from wikipedia:Some people would interpret this to mean that the Hadith should never have been written, but according to most scholars and researchers, this hadith was valid when the Qur'an was being revealed. The reason behind this order was to prevent any risk of confusing the Qur'an with the Hadith. However, once the revelation was completed and it was certain that no more verses were going to be descended, it was permissible — and even an obligation — to write down the Hadith to preserve it throughout time, because, had the memorisers of the Hadith passed away before writing it down, the Hadiths could have disappeared. Muslims have been ordered to follow the Sunna of Prophet Muhammad because it is an order clearly stated in the Qur'an in several places such as in Surah al-Imran (3) verses 32 and 132, Surah an-Nisa' (4) verse 59, Surah al-Maidah (5) verse 92, Surah al-Anfal (8) verses 1, 20, 46, Surah an-Noor (24) verses 54, 56, Surah Muhammad (47) verse 33, etc. (IslamiCity.com)
2006-12-31 11:25:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Razan 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Every religion is good and bad, depending on who follows the TRUE word, and that which radicals misconstrue for their own cause.
The Christian and Jewish faith have laws as well. If they were thrown out, would they all still be a religion?
The hadith Ahmed, Vol. 1, page 171 says: "Do not write down anything of me except the Qur'an. Whoever writes other than that should delete it." Some people would interpret this to mean that the Hadith should never have been written, but according to most scholars and researchers, this hadith was valid when the Qur'an was being revealed. The reason behind this order was to prevent any risk of confusing the Qur'an with the Hadith. However, once the revelation was completed and it was certain that no more verses were going to be descended, it was permissible — and even an obligation — to write down the Hadith to preserve it throughout time, because, had the memorisers of the Hadith passed away before writing it down, the Hadiths could have disappeared.
2006-12-31 11:15:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Justsyd 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I heart nothing about prophet Mohamed said that...the hadith and the Quran complete each other...like bible and Jesus saying for the Christians...and if prophet Mohamed said so there was no hadith was known and we (Muslims) won't know thing prophet Mohamed said it and it is happening now...people who lived with prophet Mohamed (pbuh) loved and respected his words and for sure if he said that they won't do that....even the hadith didn't say that what is the problem with writing prophet Mohamed's words...it is not a crime...or should we suppose to know that we have a prophet without knowing anything about him...no hadith said we shouldn't write the hadith so why should they not write the hadith??....and in the Quran i don't know the aya but it meant that in your prophet merit example i think that is enough...
2006-12-31 11:25:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by sarah5 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
WRONG!
The things that cause Islam to be ridiculed are the Hadiths and Sunnahs. WRONG!
~~~~~~~~~~~
The Quaran promotes KILLING - don't bull me that this is only a self defence thing.. Read Mo.'s history!
http://www.easyislam.com/chronology_of_events_in_the_life_of_muhammad.asp
The Verse Of The Sword from Al-Tawbah
Fight and slay the pagans (infidels) wherever ye find them, and seize them,
beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war." - Sura 9:5
"Prophet, make war on unbelievers and hypocrites, and deal rigorously
with them." - Sura 9:73
"Let not the unbelievers think they will ever get away. They have not
the power to do so. Muster against them all the men and cavalry at
your command, so that you may strike terror into the enemy of Allah
and your enemy... Prophet, (Mohammed) rouse the faithful to arms!
If they (the non-Muslims) incline to peace (accept Islam) make
peace with them." - Sura 8:59
"If they reject your judgement, know that it is Allah's wish to scourge
them for their sins." - Sura 5:49
"Believers (Muslims), take neither Jews nor Christians to be your
friends: they are friends with one another.
Whoever of you seeks their friendship shall become one of their number,
and Allah does not guide (those Jewish and Christian) wrong-doers." - Sura 5:51
"Not Jesus, but a look alike, was substituted and crucified at the Cross." -4:157
THIS IS BLASPHEMY - AND A LIE! No proof can be offered at all
2006-12-31 11:16:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by whynotaskdon 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
the temple of Solomon, is an analogous with the aid of fact the Tabernacle, which God reported replaced into the likeness of Heaven, Are you optimistic it is not a non secular metaphor, that he replaced into journey to heaven in visions, the two way I believe you, it replaced into torn down, and what could of been left of Herod temple isn't lots to work out however the wailing wall. Mohammed isn't something greater beneficial than a pretend prophet. no longer be attentive to-how why the muslims could even think of what they think of. He replaced right into a liberator, no longer a prophet. He replaced right into a revolt against his own human beings; he stood against pagan gods, and wanted yet one god, so he dug back to his Esau roots to type the roots of Esau's God, it extremely is our God. yet in simple terms like Esau, he married Hittie women (Falsehood). devil is very sensible, and used Mohammed in a time whilst the persons on the black rock the place at an econmic collaspe. Mulsims are in simple terms Ishamuel and esau clans that are combat for birthrights. they are Jealous human beings, and dont do actual in the eyes of God, they do what they think of is maximum suitable on guy's standards. they suspect they have the main concepts-blowing to be Abraham's kingship, no longer Issac and Jacob
2016-10-06 06:42:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by bugenhagen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are statements in the Quran about "heaven" and food and drink and untouched people. No quantity is specified, but it IS in the Quran. Supposed to be high quality stuff too.
I'm a Christian, by the way.
2006-12-31 11:14:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
The problem is PEOPLE. We take any thing that is written as a guide to how we should live, and rewrite it to suit ourselves.
Even the bible is re-written to serve certain world leaders, religious and others.
As long as people are writing, there will always be corruption. Especially in ANY religion.
2006-12-31 11:14:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
For true peace, I'd suggest deleting the quran too.
2006-12-31 11:21:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Peace Upon You
I advise you to vist this site http://www.sultan.org/ ,you will find the answers of all your questions.
2006-12-31 15:30:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Marzouk 2
·
0⤊
1⤋