2006-12-31 09:19:47 · 32 answers · asked by Blessed 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I see no evidence to suggest the King james is the only true version. This is someones belief that they are trying to pass on legalistically. No logic in this position whatsoever. Jesus didn't speak the King's English neither did he carry one around. there are many good versions and a few lousy ones. I like the King James for its poetic way of saying things however it is complete nonsense to try and impose some personal preferance as the only true version. Besidesthere are a few errors that have been translated into it that those who hold this view are unaware of. Such as one verse says the Holy Spirit itself when it should have read himself. They improperly tranlsated this word and made a person into an impersonal entity.
2006-12-31 09:36:03 · answer #1 · answered by Edward J 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The work of Ivan Panin, a Russian mathematician, demonstrated that the source documents for the KJV essentially had a "golden thread" which ran through the entire bible. I might add that Ivan was also a linguist and spoke 7 languages including those which were prevalent in the times of the codification of the scriptures. The ancient languages, especially Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic, utilized no separate number system, consequently the alphabet letters came to represent numbers. Mr. Panin noticed unique combinations of prime numbers throughout what is known as the received text, and only that text from which the KJV rest upon contain all of these features. There is a book entitled "The Inspiration of the Scriptures Scientifically Demonstrated" by Panin which I might suggest. I have posted a link which contains excerpts from another book about the work of Mr. Panin. Always remember, though, (an this is tongue-in-cheek) "if it's good enough for the Apostle Paul, then . . ."!
2006-12-31 09:46:22 · answer #2 · answered by Peace W 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I suspect it would be really difficult to translate the King James version into other languages such as Russian or Korean. There are plenty of Bibles out there that have been updated to modern language without disturbing the context, which itself is a pretty amazing thing considering all the languages and all the different versions.
The Word remains the same in every version.( except those bibles that had additional books added on by some churches and individuals in later centuries that don't coincide with the original writings and teachings.
2006-12-31 09:31:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, not really. The KJV 1611 is the authorized version of the Bible, However it is not the oldest English translation of the Bible, nor was it the translation written by the Prophets. To read the original word of God you must go back to the Greek and Hebrew original manuscript, which is why ministers are encouraged even today to take the "Holy Languages" in seminary. Ever notice how the KJV sounds like Shakespeare its because it was written about the same time period. Hope that helps.
2006-12-31 09:33:58 · answer #4 · answered by YouthGuy 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes
The Lord said that he will preserve his word forever.
He says many times in the bible to not take away from his word or add to his word.
His word is what is going to judge us in the end.
All other perversions have been changed and messed with.
All other perversions are owned by some man.
The only version not owned or messed with is the King James.
2006-12-31 09:27:24 · answer #5 · answered by sharpy 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well, the Bible is the Bible and yes, the Bible is the one and only true Word of God. However, I wouldn't be so quick to assume that the KJV [King James Version] is the only true translation while the others are false. Although I am not sure about NIV translation, I am sure there are other translations that are just as or more effective and inspiring than the KJV Bible.
2006-12-31 09:24:30 · answer #6 · answered by Sapphire-by-the-sea 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
IT IS TRIED AND TRUE!
It is an authentic and authorized version of the original texts, manuscripts, scrolls.
KJV SITE
http://www.angelfire.com/la/prophet1/holybiblepictures.html
very informative about the KJV
Christian in PA
2007-01-01 02:11:50 · answer #7 · answered by Penny Mae 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. Infact of the translation of the Scripture King James has the greatest proof of direct tampering of phrasing inorder to apease the financer (King James). This by no means means that King James should be thrown out however. God is greater than King James and there is also clear evidence of God working through that translation.
The most comprehensive unbias translation is the New Oxford Annotated.
2006-12-31 09:24:51 · answer #8 · answered by mike g 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋
That depends on you.....what is your conviction. Some people swear by the King James version, while others like the New International Version, or the Amplified Version. It'll depend on you actually. Best of luck to you.....Happy New Year !!!
2006-12-31 09:22:57 · answer #9 · answered by cajunrescuemedic 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
This is another great debate. Personally, I believe it is- because it the only version that remains the SAME since its original pringing in 1611. I have personally seen other versions where they have changed from one year to another in reprinting. It may be harder to learn at first, but like learning a new language, and relying on the Holy Spirit to teach you, it will begin to make sense. God does not change, and neither does his Word.
2006-12-31 09:25:04 · answer #10 · answered by littledreamergirl 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋