BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thats the biggest Hit for a Question I have ever Seen. Teach them Cissy Punk Pusies Respect and Loyalty to their Public Citizens. Send them to the marines and they must serve atleast 10 years. Drug Enforcement Task Forces should be for the Trained Rehabilited Drug Addicts, and Forensics and Balistics should be for Trained rehabilited criminals. In reality, my opinion there should be NO POLICE, only our Military to Rule us. At least they have MUCH RESPECT for PEOPLE.
2006-12-31 09:04:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Stephanie B 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
If they were an MP, they are more qualified than 'someone of the street'. This is for the same reason someone who has been an officer for 4 years is more qualified than 'someone off the street'. They have experience on the job. While the average member of the military may be more qualified in weapons use than the average civilian, that doesn't necessarily mean they are more qualified as police officers. Law enforcement and war fighting are not the same.
2006-12-31 07:52:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by STEVEN F 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. A Military Police Officer is not qualified by any means for civilian law enforcement other than emergency situations. There is a night and day difference. They do bring several other skills into play such as discipline and duty. Also, leadership and common sense plays well in the military. There just isn't enough training about civilian law enforcement issues. I thought it would be transparent but did I get an eye opener.
2006-12-31 10:52:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by spag 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say NO,
In the military I would think it would be easier to be a military police officer on a post as most on post know the consequences of telling the officer to kiss off or what have you.
I think that the military laws are quite different and most people in the service FEAR the consequences of being detained by mp's and act accordingly.
In the civilian world, it is not quite the same...
so an officer assigned to an urban area would be in for a shock making the transistion from a military post.
Just a guess
Don't really know for sure
I would guess that they would respect the chain of command better and most would have no objections to working odd shifts and the like.
2006-12-31 08:28:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by karen g 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
They MIGHT be better qualified, but it's on a case-by-case basis.
One of the things about training "experienced" people is that they're going to have habits to unlearn. Some of the skills and training transfers over quite readily, and some needs to be completely disregarded in favor of the civilian standards.
I'd feel more comfortable with a military cop once things got ugly; but a people-smart civilian cop sometimes has the right instincts to keep a situation from degenerating.
2006-12-31 07:50:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It depends on what you are talking about when you talk about military policing. There are several types of MP's. Most MP's are not what you think they are just because they are called police. Some MP's work in Law Enforcement. Those guys/gals are qualified and know how to do "real" police work. Municipal police departments are paramilitary, thus, an ex military person fits in well. Our agency likes to hire ex military because they are more prone to follow orders and keep the chain of command. They know what military organization is all about. We find that when we hire non military personnel, we have more problems out of them.
2006-12-31 10:14:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by gablueliner 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Civilian policing is much different than MP work. MPs have a community policing component (taking care of law enforcement on a base), but they were created, and still carry a primary focus, of dealing with prisoners and other combat related personnel.
Further, MPs function under the authority of the UCMJ - not the Constitution of the United States. Huge difference between policing a community where the rights of the individual come secondary to the needs of the service and policing a community where the rights of the individual supercede the rights of society.
2006-12-31 07:51:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by ab2li 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are better trained to be a military police.
There is large difference in rights and rules of arrest for military on military bases than there is on the street.
Both are very well qualified todo thier jobs.
2006-12-31 07:57:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
you're already set for academic standards. maximum departments require no college, basically a extreme college degree or equivalent. you may not have been convicted of a legal, and you will desire to attend a state approved Police Academy. (to try this could require sponsorship via a branch) maximum departments have a reserve or auxiliary team who artwork area time as volunteer officers. They receive education, at their own cost, and artwork below an entire time officer till an entire time place comes open. those departments that have reserve officers will hire from that team extremely than seek for officer applicants off the line. in the event that they hire you, they are going to deliver you to the Academy at their cost. super departments with extra advantageous manpower will hire instant and deliver you to the Academy, it somewhat is oftentimes community. As for age, i'm fifty one and am a reserve officer for my city of 6,000. while an entire time place opens, i'd desire to have first threat to be employed. In our branch, reserve officers have a similar authority as an entire time officer. We write citations, make site visitors stops, arrest, serve warrants, and fill out comments.
2016-10-19 07:05:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure they would, because they already have most of the required training. They would just need training in the provincial/state and municipal laws of the area they are policing.
2006-12-31 10:11:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by joeanonymous 6
·
0⤊
0⤋