Please correct me if I'm wrong....?

Question

But the basis of evolution is that life evolves based on things that become necessary;so everytime a certain need arises,life adapts or evolves accordingly.
If we follow is "logic"and life supposedly crawled out of the water;then tat means all body parts would of had to of evolved.This would include internal organs and body structures.But that doesnt make sense becuase how could theese things(internal organs & stuff) evolve if there was no life there in the first place to evolve?Evan the tiniest life would have had to evolve from something;but again there would be no life,no living thing to evolve from.
Unless scientist are asserting that evolution or nature it's self started the process;but then,using "logic" evolution or nature it'self is not a living thinking being.Just a word to describe wildlife and the changes it goes through.
So following this obviously ridiculus idea and logic,how does an inanimate thing create a living self sustaing system?

Looks like evolution has serious holes to me. Agree? Or No?

Answer 1

Evolution is separate from biogenesis, the beginning of life.

The current scientific theory is that there was a "primal soup" containing random proteins and amino acids, and something like a bolt of lightning hit, and the spark fused them together into single-celled, very simple organisms. The difference between "life" and "chemicals reacting with each other" is a very fine line, at those levels.

Evolution builds from there: claims that it's likely those organisms were competing with each other, and those who had some trait that was better suited to some conditions (like, could absorb more light, or could swim deeper, or whatever) survived better, and gave birth to (or divided into) offspring that kept those traits. Genetic mutations are usually fatal, but some of them contain a useful adaptation to a niche that the creature didn't previously have access to, and over time, the creatures changed into the great variety of plant & animal life we have today.

Which is maybe a bit hard to swallow, but no more ridiculous than "there's this guy who watches the whole universe, who knows every atom of every galaxy, and he cares who I have sex with on Saturday nights."

Answer 2

No, you are not wrong on most counts. Yes, evolution, and darwinists have major flaws in their thinking, or choose to be intellectually dishonest with themselves. This may sound rude, but it seems to be the case, nonetheless. I don't understand why or how they can believe it. Look at good science, and things that cannot be disputed, like the anthropic constants, and one will quickly see, that evolution is simply, impossible, the way atheists or darwinists use it to explain our origins. Excellent question, and points made.