2006-12-31 05:37:45 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hello photograf... :)
No proof that something doesn't exist is not a proof that it does.
Correct..
==============================================
No proof that something doesn't exist, is not proof that it doesn't exist..
Correct..
Happy New Year..To All..
With Love..In Christ.. :)
2006-12-31 05:44:53 · answer #1 · answered by EyeLovesJesus 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, yes -- that's correct. It's a logical fallacy to say that lack of proof is proof of something. Likewise, it would be equally illogical to dismiss common sense. Just because someone can't prove that talking dragons never existed doesn't mean they did. Common sense - being able to discern fantasy from reality.
2006-12-31 13:42:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You cannot prove a negative. I know there is no proof of God. I also know that there is much proof that the bible is in no way the "word of God".
2006-12-31 13:41:48 · answer #3 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
we all believe in lots of things that have no proof.
Is love real? Can you prove it?
2006-12-31 13:44:34 · answer #4 · answered by Jennifer D 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there is no way to prove that something doesnt exist
you can only prove that something does exist
proof is really dependent upon some physical evidence
with out it you cannot have proof
2006-12-31 13:42:32 · answer #5 · answered by Josephus 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is plenty of proof for God. Just look around you.
2006-12-31 13:43:32 · answer #6 · answered by cubby 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
..True. But when humans propose that one of the things 'You can't prove doesn't exist..' will send you to eternal suffering if you don't believe in it, and if you do you will have eternal joy, all harping on what happens after death...something no one is alive to tell us about, then some will blindly follow.
2006-12-31 13:42:08 · answer #7 · answered by Poo 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, or proof of existence.
2006-12-31 13:40:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Have you considered that 'proof' in the way we mean it is merely 'that which convinces me' and nothing else?
At the least, what you are introducing is 'possibility'.
2006-12-31 13:43:58 · answer #9 · answered by xaviar_onasis 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
True, but I still believe that which I can't see.
24For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?
Romans 8:24
2006-12-31 13:41:44 · answer #10 · answered by Eric G 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋