With the whole Amreica sending in troops into Iraaq,what are they gaining out of it? They not getting the oil, Osama Bin Laden or is that they just want more world control & domination?
Its just that 1 American Soldier is killed & its headlines what about all those innocent lives in Iraq/Iran are destroyed. Yes its sad for American & Iranian families to loose a loved one.
But why not America & the Bush administration take the troops out of Iraq then therefor less lives are killed (Iraqies & Americans) Let Iraq sort out there own internal problems & let them be. Get aid from not only Americans (not war or killing people) & other world countries & leaders.
Why cant the war just stop?
Sorry if anyone took insult from this no offence should be taken just my thoughts & opinions. Would be nice to hear what other people think
2006-12-31 03:37:07 · 6 answers · asked by MEHNAZ B 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Many people feel the same as you do, and rightfully, everyone all over the world has a right to their views and opinions.
I think it is sad, for any loss of human life, American, Iraqi, Iranian, African, etc. but the fact of war is death. Sad but everyone loves to jump into a war, but not to crazy or turn a blind eye to the reality of war, DEATH.
Leaving Iraq right now will only lead to more chaos and more loss of inocent Iraqi lives. I'm not crazy about having our brave men and wemen out their fighting for the personal agenda of this administration that is dictating our country, but the fact remains we opened the can worms (the Iraqi Conflict), and now we have to follow through and do the right thing. Its so eazy to throw our hands up in the air and say its no longer our problem, while ultimately the people of Iraq suffer for our actions ( of rushing in there without a valid reason/reasons baised on lies, and rushing out because we are not winning).
I believe we need to have a fair and equal medium established, where both sides are gratified fairly ( Americans and Iraqis). There needs to be a non bias investigation (but thats like waiting for money to grow on trees), someone who isn't taken in and wrapped up in the corperate and political coruption to verify the situation and come up with a solution that benifts everyone, and intitally uphold the original intention (that was broadcasted to the American people in order to gain support for this conflict in Iraq) about providing the people of Iraq freedom and a safe and solid democracy ran by Iraq in and of itself.
But what do I know.......
2006-12-31 04:00:24 · answer #1 · answered by Krazee about my pets! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When we were there the first time, we pulled out too much too fast, and the Kurds in the north and many around Basra in the south died in rising against Hussein. If we left now, there's a real chance the bits of civil war that are so bothersome now would become a huge and vastly bloodier civil war in the aftermath. It seems strange that some shootings and bombings are needed to save lives, but that's the world we live in. It's certainly not a unique or even unusual situation.
2006-12-31 11:43:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If only that was possible.
Consider the fact that the Al Qaida presence in Iraq is very high. Until they are eradicated, more people would be killed if we were to just leave.
Believe me, I wish it was possible too. But realistically, it's just not.
2006-12-31 03:40:55 · answer #3 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Theyre not gaining anything, theyre just helping Iraq.
2006-12-31 03:50:03 · answer #4 · answered by I Hate Liberals 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely right. Re deploy all troops immediately to mexicant border or would that be too simple?
2006-12-31 03:44:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well because Iraq and other mideast countries were not handling their own problems very well on 9/11. It became our problem then.
2006-12-31 03:41:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋