I know Pantene and John Frieda make just such shampoos? Are they a good thing or a marketing gimmick?
2006-12-31 02:51:47 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Beauty & Style ➔ Hair
Sorry. I love big words, then I get to use my spell check.
2006-12-31 02:57:51 · update #1
I would call them ok, but try thermasilk it rocckkkzzz.
2006-12-31 02:56:26 · answer #1 · answered by Wings*of*Light 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shampoos like that really can have an effect. However, you might not like it. When I buy shampoo for my natural hair colour, it often makes it appear darker than it is. They are not marketing gimmicks but yield different results.
2006-12-31 02:55:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
me is right. Shampoo is detergent. No matter what natural products or colors, or oils, or smells, they add to it.
What works is cream rinse afterwards, left on for one minute.
And then a setting gel or foam.
2006-12-31 02:59:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No i use John Frieda products and they are very good.
2006-12-31 02:54:13 · answer #4 · answered by Bella 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
marketing. All shampoo is just soap and water with fragrances.
2006-12-31 02:53:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, but did you have to use such a fancy word, i had to look it up.
2006-12-31 02:54:32 · answer #6 · answered by rhino_man420 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you want to keep your color constant and last longer :)
(if you dyed it)
2006-12-31 02:53:12 · answer #7 · answered by Z 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's good as long as youre using A good product line. Aveda, TIGI...............
2006-12-31 02:57:22 · answer #8 · answered by bluestar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YAH I TRIED IT B-CUS I HAVE RED HAIR AND IT STARTED GETTING BROWN CUS OF WINTER AND IT STAYED RED IT IS AWSOME
2006-12-31 03:08:31 · answer #9 · answered by melly 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋