Dinosaurs existed at the same time as early Humans and were domesticated by them to perform many useful tasks.
2006-12-31 02:58:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by iknowtruthismine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You should also check out the issue of Time magazine that talks about this. It actually depicts where humans are on a tree of primates. It shows how some "branch" off from others. I liked the documnetary, but the visually imagine in the magazine helped me process the information. Here is a copy of the article, unfortunatley, the picture I'm talking about can't be found on the site.
2006-12-31 11:01:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by KS 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it's accepted based on the fossil evidence (with no missing links incredibly enough) that there were several homonid species co-existing but cro-Magnon for some reason proved the best able to adapt and establish himself.
2006-12-31 10:50:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, absolutely.
Stop thinking of evolution as a ladder, where one species replaces another. Think of it more as a bush. Some bushes have lots of branches, some only a few. At the moment, the hominid bush just has one little twig left - us. Compared to, say, antelopes, we've not actually been that sucessful a group.
2006-12-31 10:49:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
silverbirch is correct.
There is tons of speculation that homo may have mated with neanderthal, for instance. I believe the latest evidence shows that we did not. But that can always change.
2006-12-31 10:50:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I saw it, rather enjoyed it too. And interesting to think aobut exactly what traits make us different and how they evolved.
2006-12-31 10:53:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by jleslie4585 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I did not see it and have no answers, but it sounds interesting.
2006-12-31 10:52:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it was an interesting tale....kinda hard to believe though.
2006-12-31 10:49:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by 4 Shades of Blue 4
·
0⤊
2⤋