English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Someone said that in the bible it says whites HAVE to marry whites and blacks HAVE to marry blacks.

2006-12-31 02:44:52 · 19 answers · asked by samii 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

19 answers

It is not in the Bible. People may say it is, though, to promote their own hateful and racist agendas.

The American Messianic Fellowship's web site gives a concise discussion of this issue from an evangelical and literalist point of view, though others may differ in their interpretation of the biblically recounted events, and the literality with which they take biblical narratives:

" The Bible never prohibits marriage between races on a continental scale. The Israelites were forbidden to intermarry with pagans they were to dispossess from Canaan (Deut. 7:3-4), but this was a matter of compromising the faith, not ethnic purity. Likewise in the New Testament (2 Corinthians 6:14) Christians are told not to be "unequally yoked together with unbelievers." This has nothing to do with race. Non-Israelites who genuinely embraced the God of Israel were to be welcomed. (Leviticus 19:34) A prime example of this is Ruth the Moabitess, who became the grandmother of David, and thereby an ancestor of the Messiah.

According to the Bible, all human beings are descended from one couple. In fact, the Hebrew word for "human being" literally means "son of Adam." Since all but Noah's family were destroyed in the great flood, all the peoples of the earth today must be descended from Noah and his three sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth. In the genealogies given in Genesis 10, the names of certain people are identical with the Hebrew names of certain countries. Mitzraim, for example, is Egypt. Javan is Greece. The Israelites themselves are descended from Shem, as are the Arabs, Aramaeans, and others of that region, giving rise to the notion that Europe was settled by descendants of Japheth, Africa by descendants of Ham, and Asia by descendants of Shem. There are exceptions, however. The original Canaanites are said to come form Ham, but the land of Canaan is in Asia.

There is no mention of any distinguishing physical characteristics among these various peoples by which we could equate them with the modern concept of "race." The Bible doesn't say anything about putting different races on different continents. Just as there are family resemblances within any large clan, such as "the Family Nose", fiery red hair, or whatever, it stands to reason that when a certain segment of the population is separated from another for hundreds or thousands of years, these family resemblances will be intensified and become especially noticeable when they come face to face with another branch of the family where a different set of characteristics has come out. Modern Jews run the full range of colors available to the human race."

2006-12-31 02:53:11 · answer #1 · answered by forbidden_planet 4 · 1 1

unquestionably, you may desire to alter your wording purely particularly: Hebrew Bible Roman Catholic Bible Protestant Bible The Jewish scholars finished the version of the Hebrew Bible in with reference to the 0.33 century. That text textile is roofed in the two the RC and Prot. Bible. The order of the books is diverse, through fact of underlying assumptions. The Christian Bible (the recent testomony) wasn't somewhat nailed down until virtually the 10th century or so. After that, it replaced into locked in. This replaced into carried out in a chain of Church Councils. this article is the same in the two the RC and Prot. Bible, and the previous testomony is especially a lot the same in the two of those Bibles, different than that the order would be slightly diverse. the sole distinction between the RC and Prot. Bibles is the presence of the Apocrypha -- quite a few books that have been unknown in Hebrew, yet have been lined immediately in Greek language translations of the previous testomony that have been in common use around the time of the early Church. That Greek translation of the previous testomony (noted as the Septuagint) replaced into so common (maximum Jews did not at that factor remember the thank you to speak or examine Hebrew anymore) that whenever you come across the previous testomony quoted interior the recent testomony, this is continuously the Septuagint text textile they're quoting.

2016-12-11 19:48:57 · answer #2 · answered by degennaro 4 · 0 0

The Bible does NOT say that at all. IN the Old Testament though, the children of Israel were admonished (commanded by Moses) not to intermarry with pagans so that their children may grow up in the fear of the Lord. The greatest thing that led to Solomon's downfall was his many foreign wives who were allowed to keep their own pagan religion and gods. As can be imagined, the children of these women worshipped both Yahweh and the god or goddess of their pagan mothers. Eventually, this polluted the entire court and then the entire land. God wanted the Israelites to preserve the purity of their religion, that was why intermarriage to pagans was condemned. However, if the pagan converted and became a follower of Yahweh, he or she was incorporated into the community of Israel. This was what happened to Ruth (grandma of David), who was a Moabite.

2006-12-31 03:16:02 · answer #3 · answered by Phoebhart 6 · 1 0

nowhere in the bible does it say this. about the marriage arrangement it says the man will leave his parents and stick to his wife and 2 cords (husband and wife) are stronger than 1 and 3 cords (husband, wife, God) can not be easily broken. It also says wife respect husbands, etc. etc. But nowhere does it specfiy or even hint that people should only marry within their own race

2006-12-31 02:48:57 · answer #4 · answered by Mackenzie 4 · 2 0

The book of Numbers 36:6 says "This is what the LORD commands for Zelophehad's daughters: They may marry anyone they please as long as they marry within the tribal clan of their father"

there's a lot of stuff in the bible that doesn't make sense these days though.

i say go ask your priest.

2006-12-31 02:55:42 · answer #5 · answered by Sarah G 1 · 0 0

Hey there.. Hapyp new years!!!
I looked up a few thigns on me good auld bible and... it says:The Lord looks upon the creatures He has made with compassion, no matter to what race they may belong. God "hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth." Acts 17:26. Speaking to His disciples the Saviour said, "All ye are brethren." Matthew 23:8. God is our common Father, and each one of us is our brother's keeper.

check out: http://islandgrove.qldwide.net.au/should_black_and_white_people_marry.html for more info....

Thanks
;)

2006-12-31 03:03:00 · answer #6 · answered by littlemizzhelp 1 · 0 0

Definitely not in the Holy Bible.

2006-12-31 02:47:04 · answer #7 · answered by Darktania 5 · 3 0

You will not find that in the Bible,: You will find this,Do not marry an Unbeliever,That is an uneven yoke

2006-12-31 03:25:45 · answer #8 · answered by section hand 6 · 1 0

it may not say it that way but what is known is you bring a curse on your family when mix races. the white family rejects the black and the black family rejects the white. then u have no family but the man u have married. then u find out that youre not the only woman he has, and he beats you up and now u want to leave him but your family has rejected you and you have no place to go. by this time you have two mixed kids that both families reject and you out on you own. its always best to stick with your own who would want that kind of life?

2006-12-31 02:59:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

he says to yoke equally which means to marry someone who is a Christian, He never says anything about what u said

2006-12-31 03:06:54 · answer #10 · answered by agirl4god 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers