I watch a lot of TV and I see lots of American TV shows that go on about no sex before marriage and purity...
I know that many "family oriented" TV shows like to stick in a moral, but this one seems to be constantly being thrown about...
So why??? What is with the downer on no sex before marriage??? Can't JUST be because of STD's, cos it is easy to avoid them... Can't be JUST be because of unwanted pregnancies, cos with plenty of education, that can be avoided...
Is it because the education of kids by family and the education system is woefully inadequate??? Or because the "Moral Majority" stygmatises anyone who is interested in sex but not marriage???
2006-12-30 23:59:57 · 5 answers · asked by Forlorn Hope 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
I'm not obsessed with purity, but my own self respect. My body is more then a sexual object, and I choose to share it with only my husband now. Our bond is built on trust. From what I've seen of open marriages, true harmony isn't possible.
I think as humans we are meant to be monogamous.
2007-01-01 07:17:36 · answer #1 · answered by avalonlee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Remember the Pilgrims? These folk made a huge impact on our country and many of their values continue to resonate in America. Long before the moral majority religious people tried to have power over their children's sex lives. Even up until the 1950's sex was shameful, hidden, and nice women weren't supposed to enjoy it. We have come a long way baby, but there is still a ways to go. Perhaps the generations to come will see sex as a normal part of existance and not a tool of control.
2006-12-31 00:06:33 · answer #2 · answered by imask8r 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'm relatively conflicted approximately this, to be common. there is no denying that the relationship between a daughter and her father is extremely important; it impacts her experience of self-relatively worth, her view of her very own feminity, and the ideas she makes in in seek of a miles significant other. So fostering an outstanding, asserting relationship is a good subject. i think i'm having difficulty with the "purity" emphasis here. it style of feels to "load" the form with extra suitable than it would carry. i do no longer comprehend if it is accomplished anymore, yet whilst i became relating to the age of the females interior the object we had an annual "Father-Daughter Dinner", which risk-free dancing, as a (public) college interest. It felt a sprint weird and wonderful to me, and additionally my acquaintances, yet we style of went alongside with it and whilst we've been given over our self-extensive unsleeping teenaged selves we certainly had fun. (i'm assuming extremely some the dads did, too.) yet had that "purity" subject been extra to it, it would have been slightly plenty. All in all ... i think of those persons have in basic terms the perfect of intentions, yet the place a daughter's blossoming sexuality is in contact there is an extremely effective line that good adult adult males walk and this blurs that line quite uncomfortably. despite got here approximately to mom-daughter teas? Sigh.
2016-11-25 02:38:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question is little bit diverted from the main track.
It should be like the Chritian test of purity according to Bible.
2006-12-31 00:02:12 · answer #4 · answered by eitemad_eitemad 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
in Finland i saw porn next to aspirin in the RX window......i love European TV.............we're too uptight about sex here in amerika.......the religious agenda
2006-12-31 00:09:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋