Is it the USA or the Iraqis themselves?
If the Iraqis decided his fate, then why did the USA hand him over to them, despite him being a Prisoner of War?
2006-12-30 22:02:45 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Dear friends, I might be out of my f ucking mind.
USA army killed and maimed, intentionally so, hundreds and thousands of Iraqi civilians, women and children, hospitals and villages included. Please categorise these acts, in your own vocabulary.
What? Louder please!!!
2006-12-30 22:21:42 · update #1
saddam killed many ppl.but what did US do by bombarding innocent ppl including children and women of iraq.where they also murderers.look at the kind of sexual and physical exploitation the US soilders did on the captives in iraq.i dont think saddam got a fair trial at all.the old man had lost everything his family,sons,power.was it necessary to kill him at 69 despite of what he did and to add to it all take a video of his death and leak it out in front of the entire world.it is disgusting.count the no. of ppl killed by him and those killed by BUSH by bombardment in Iraq.who killed the maximum no. is evident ,isn't it?
2006-12-31 06:28:23 · answer #1 · answered by ritu k 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think this suggests you're able to desire to quit asking questions approximately Y/A and bypass seem up the 7 365 days conflict between Iran and Iraq. We supported Iraq because of the fact to us on the time, they have been the least of two evils, yet politics replace as nicely. you could no longer impune the Reagan era for no longer understanding what variety of person Saddam might become. He wasn't gassing the Kurds back then, or invading Kuwait, or breaking 15 or extra UN resolutions. Resolutions that the UN warned might convey approximately effects. all and sundry on the left looks to wish to with ease ignore the stairs that it took to certainly bypass to conflict, that we had the blessing of the Congress and UN and if no longer for the u . s . a ., the UN might have no credibility in any respect. yet i'm unlikely to do your homework question for you, bypass seem up the conflict, what the politics have been on the time and the interest the U. S. had in it for your self
2016-11-25 02:32:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you asking an actual question here? Or spewing pseudo-informed leftist babble? Blah blah blah, "100 thousand iraqi civilians" first of all, that value is hugely inflated. Second of all, they were collateral damage, unintentional casualties, no matter what any leftist hiding behind a blog has to say, if they were attacking us, it'd be no different. Disagree with the executions of the war if you wish, i do, but not the intentions.
Thirdly, nuke the middle east. It sucks
2006-12-31 05:53:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I served in Desert Storm in 1991. I picked up a surrendering iraqi soldier and handed him over to the Suaidi Army, they hung him the next day. Saddam deserved to die after what he commanded his army to do. Why do people feel the need to blame someone, or government. The Iraqis wanted him dead, just like everyone else.
2006-12-30 22:07:44 · answer #4 · answered by Rick R 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
The Iraqis hanged him.
Who gives a sh*t if they hanged him? This guy was a mass murderer on a frightening scale. He had an expansionist tick in a region that, like it or not, is strategically important for the global economy. Good riddance, he deserved to be tortured, but at least he's gone.
2006-12-30 22:08:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
You are either dumb or stupid I don't know which one!!!! The man was a horrible person he raped & killed thousands of people! Who cares who is responislbe for his dealth he got what he deserved!!!! You would think different if he had done something to your family!!!! You are a very sick person! Your additional details is just stupid. If your are going to ask a question tell the truth don't lie!!
2006-12-30 23:58:05 · answer #6 · answered by d3midway semi-retired 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The first sentence of your 'additional details' is the only truth in your 'question.'
The only person responsible is Saddam himself. If he didn't carry out the heinous acts, he wouldn't have had the short drop and quick stop.
2006-12-30 22:24:26 · answer #7 · answered by jh 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
He stopef infilltration in iraq for 10 years. developed his nation. and got cost of lovinghis naton.
2006-12-31 02:42:03 · answer #8 · answered by arsh 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh grow up!!
I guess what the terrorists did and do and will do don't mean anything and don't matter?
Don't you realize how much the American soldiers have done for these impoverished, controlled and terrorized countries?
You are illiterate, my friend.
And a terrorist.
2006-12-30 23:27:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Heinous? your out of your f ucking mind, it is good. The U.S. captured and the new govt in Iraq executed him.
2006-12-30 22:09:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋