the only difference between the two is that George Bush kills under the guise of war so that makes it right?
2006-12-30 21:07:56 · 19 answers · asked by hotchocolate 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Hello =)
Regrettably, "criminal stupidity" is not a "crime against humanity"....it may be a crime against God, or a crime against nature, of course, but then, again, we don't judge these things, now do we??
Nothing about what has happened or will happen in Iraq will make it right...that is a sad truth we must accept. I don't even think Mr. Bush would disagree with that statement.
Saddam killed several million people during his political career. Bush has killed nearly a million. One is no better than the other, of course. Even President Ford seemed to concur from beyond the grave.
This is a great sadness that we will have to bear for a long time. Let's make the best of it, and not dwell upon it too much, shall we??
Namaste, and Happy New Year,
--Tom
2006-12-30 21:14:27 · answer #1 · answered by glassnegman 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Your just stupid for asking that question.I hope you dint live in the USA and vote . lets find some tortured Americans and mass graves that Bush has around the white house of his exterminated enemies then yes hang him . you are just a useful idiot of all tyrants.or a Democrat. What crimes against mankind did George Bush create? Kofi anon lets his son steal from the UN and trade with Saddam when the UN said it was illegal ..... Never mind if i have to explain it . Happy New year and long life.
2006-12-31 03:52:54 · answer #2 · answered by jdc117101 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shouldn't ALL people in governmental power be executed since they all have committed "crimes against mankind" at one time or another? I actually feel sorry for Saddam, since he was finally killed by that monkey and his father, the Bushes. I guess what George senior couldn't do, his monkey child did for him. What Saddam did during his reign in power is no different than other presidents from other countries that let their people suffer and die. I thought the whole point of having our soldiers go to Iraq was to look for Osama and punish him for the 9/11 attack? How did it go from that to help rebuild Iraq's government? Who knows?
2006-12-30 21:19:39 · answer #3 · answered by morningstar 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You know this question has been asked so many times it should not even be posted anymore. It is a stupid question Saddam got what he deserved he killed and raped thousands of innocence people!!!! Bush did nothing wrong. He is trying to help the people over there! You people just want to talk about the bad things you never mention the good things he is doing over there!!!!!!
2006-12-31 00:09:01 · answer #4 · answered by d3midway semi-retired 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One thing for sure whether you like Bush or not, no country in the persian gulf will half to worry about Saddam invading or shooting scuds at them again, i feel bad for anyone that has lost family over there and would gladly trade my old body to bring one back but know it's impossible.
we'll just have to wait and see if Bush is on the right track.
personally i think his train jumped the track yrs ago.
2006-12-31 01:22:20 · answer #5 · answered by Dave 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's an interesting point. Unfortunately, it would never hold up. The killings in War is kind of a "legal" killing, while what Saddam did, was pure murder. Saddam was a modern day Hitler, so to speak. Bush is just an idiot.
2006-12-30 21:12:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anton Mathew 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Saddam did it under the guise of war too!
2006-12-30 21:52:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah normally when two countries go to war there is killing involved. If your saying Bush should face crimes against humanity then I guess every president in history that took this country to war should to, right?
2006-12-30 21:11:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
President George Bush has done no such thing.
He has protected us, fought for us, helped thousands and hundreds of thousands.
You need to get your facts straight instead of listening to the mumbo-jumbo of the warped media and other illiterate people's thoughts.
2006-12-30 23:31:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO, Saddam was not executed for the reason you state. He was executed for reprisal killings in an assassination attempt on his life. The court found him guilty. The court sentenced him to death by hanging. He was hung.
2006-12-30 21:19:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋