2006-12-30 20:13:22 · 11 answers · asked by lonly_planet1976 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
that would be fair.......
crimes against humanity???
2006-12-30 20:21:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I would be happy to see a fair and open and honest investigation of this administration's every move and memo since before taking office in 2000.
I doubt that it will ever happen. The Bush administration has many similarities to organized crime. The big bosses could never be touched in a trial because the evidence against them was always insufficient. Congress had to pass new laws to allow the prosecutors to have a chance of a conviction. Still they were usually prosecuted for crimes unrelated the the really bad things they ordered, such as tax evasion, etc..
Then, even if he were convicted, the next President would likely grant him a pardon or at least commute the sentence to Life.
Americans should all be discussing these issues. We all know he has broken our laws. He has admitted warrant-less wiretaps in violation of the Constitution and his Oath of Office.
BRING HOME ALL OF OUR TROOPS NOW!!
2006-12-31 04:35:50 · answer #2 · answered by Jack C 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You need to do your own studing instead of believing what the "un-bias" press and Micheal Moore is telling you.
There has NOT been that many people killed in Iraq!
President Bush is NOT responsible for the deaths in Iraq regardless what the Press tells you.
2006-12-31 04:37:11 · answer #3 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A death sentence for what? Protecting our country? lmfao.....Does Hillary write these questions for the DNC? Liberals as well as conservatives signed on to the war because they (not you apparently) understand al qaeda is real, and wants you dead. Its sad that liberals have jumped on this bandwagon at the expense of soldiers lives to make a well publicized power grab in congress. Thank god we have a president with conviction like bush who has the conviction to do something about a real threat like terrorism. Pacifism, or ignoring the threat of agression like terrorism didnt work in ww2 and wont work now. The fact that you dont like war doesnt make it unnecessary. Its really sad you dont understand a fight this necessary for the survival of cour country. Using the same logic of your question would you say that Clinton needs a death sentence for ignoring the capture of Bin Ladin in sudan in 92? My point here is a simple one. You dont understand the real problem. Action as bush did is needed for survival...politics as youve offered is not needed...especially liberal pap.
2006-12-31 04:28:27 · answer #4 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no. death sentence for anyone who refers to a heroic president like GWB as a commiter of war atrocities. in the old days, anyone who said that would have been arrested for treasonous threats to a sitting president.
but that was the old days. now you just end up rolled in a carpet and dumped in Fort Marcy park looking like a suicide if you disagree with a punk leftist hippie freak.
2006-12-31 04:51:08 · answer #5 · answered by JBC 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Responsible for 1 million people in Irak?" Where do you get this stuff? Why do people become haters when a man with real b***s does what has to be done? THAT should be your question!
2006-12-31 04:24:14 · answer #6 · answered by Marc 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
not just the americans,people all over the world think he deserved to die
2006-12-31 04:19:52 · answer #7 · answered by jacoboy001 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would agree.
2006-12-31 04:25:53 · answer #8 · answered by Jaff 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i would
2006-12-31 04:15:34 · answer #9 · answered by OTL 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
keep dreaming, ******.
2006-12-31 04:16:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋