To excute Saddam Hussein while G. Bush is still alive.
They both committed crimes against humanity, but now one is dead and one is alive...... and the weird matter... that Bush excuted Saddam.
2006-12-30 18:00:26 · 16 answers · asked by MagicWand 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
oh shut the **** up
2006-12-30 18:02:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 7⤋
I don't feel good about executing anyone. Yes, I know he killed many people but I do not believe that it is justice to take another life. Keeping him in prison and allowing the families of the people he tortured and killed to come and see him would be a better punishment than death, as far as I'm concerned- he is a "free man" now and got away easy. As far as Bush is concerned, big brother is watching so be wary of what you say and where you say it-- if you see a black sedan 1/2 block down from where you live don't be surprised!
2006-12-30 18:04:37 · answer #2 · answered by mac 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I agree that Bush is a dirty rotten scoundrel, and that he has created wars in countries where the US does not belong. There would be a huge hew and cry if it was ever suggested that Bush be hung or executed. or some reason the US thinks its ok for Bush to do what he's done. On the other hand Saddam was sentenced to death by the Iraqi gvmt but was held in the custody of the US until his execution.to prevent public humiliation.
2006-12-30 18:07:21 · answer #3 · answered by ogopogo 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
If you were to have written about Saddam what you just wrote about President Bush and lived in Iraq while he was still in power you, your family and your friends would have been tortured to death. Now, you answer your own question on your way back to SANDLAND.
Thank you
2006-12-30 18:08:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush did not excute Saddam. The people of Iraq sentenced him to be hanged.
2006-12-30 18:04:09 · answer #5 · answered by lita ozzy bear 3 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Leaders arnt above insanity but they are above the lord it seems.What hope is there 4 the humanity killing dosnt stop killing. Didnt these leaders studie history at school. This is the 21st century when will have truly wize n vertous leaders. leading by example.
2006-12-30 18:10:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Actually it is justice. Any nation is justified in using military action when it is necessary and in their nation's best interest for security, but a government that doesn't recognize natural rights isn't just...so you're phrasing is incorrect. Also Bush didn't execute Saddam...the Iraqi government did.
2006-12-30 18:17:00 · answer #7 · answered by quad5 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
what crime did bush commit? No you moronic liar deceiver and twister of fact! Iraq was under UN and US sanctions that they continually broke and shoved their nose up at daring anyone to stop them! GWBush gave ol "so-dam-insane" a chance to comply with the UN resolutions or else! He gave him a large grace reign in addition to the ten years he had after invading kuwait! So dam insane mocked the deadline and we just did what we said we would do! We removed a evil murderer from power end of story. Now what crime are you referring to? Oh i got it protecting the world from evil.
2006-12-30 18:17:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
when Saddam was executed bush was sleeping. he had nothing to do with it. he left it up to Saddam's country to execute him. he wants the Iraqi people to be able to control their country. bush wants to pull out but the Iraqis are not ready for the forces to leave. i wish they would hurry up and learn to control their own country so are service men and woman can come home. their children and wife's need them home.
2006-12-30 18:09:56 · answer #9 · answered by loretta 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
lol A I slick agree but as the sayn go you weep what you sew so he gone get his too.
2006-12-30 18:48:38 · answer #10 · answered by Tip :) 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is very wonderful; justice and the shame is you are not swinging from a rope alone with saddam the kiler.
2006-12-30 18:03:10 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋