I was working in Taji, Iraq and watched truckloads of HUGE missiles being driven by all day long a year or so ago. There were huge anthrax drying towers in the distance and the ground was contaminated all over the place. Also, it is a known fact that the Soviets were racing to Syria with loads of long range weapons as we were advancing from Kuwait. Don't people read up on this before they make the bland ignorant statements of "there were no WMD's?" God blessed America, but forgot to give these people a brain or something.
2006-12-30 17:54:25 · 16 answers · asked by bill g 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
This was entirely a propaganda war within the US. Liberals were so intent on regaining power, they were actually giving the terrorists good ammunition for their own propaganda war. They even threw it back in the face of the libs. Went so far as to congratulate them on winning the election... So, little oversights like WMD not being there were strategically aimed at the demise of the republicans in power... anyone not watching this on a regular basis, wasn't really watching tv very much. Or listening to the prime media of the country.. As soon as the election was over, there was good news emanating from the far east..Odd!!
2006-12-30 18:23:21 · answer #1 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Something tells me this tard has never set foot in Iraq, much less in Taji. Any monkey with a keyboard and the right keywords would have been able to find out that Taji had been Iraq's primary advanced weapons area going atleast as far back as the early 80s
2006-12-30 18:12:33 · answer #2 · answered by Mark G 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, for one thing, the Bush administration currently admits that they haven't found weapons of mass destruction. So they now claim different reasons for the war in Iraq besides WMD. I think the recent claim is it was for democracy for the people in Iraq and/or liberating them from Saddam, etc. Do you have a link to any research to the claim of weapons of mass destruction being found in Iraq? I have not heard in the media of any weapons of mass destruction being found either, and I read the news daily and listen to CNN 4 or 5 times weekly, check the internet periodically.
2006-12-30 18:46:43 · answer #3 · answered by Karen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's face it, you have no idea what you saw. Huge missiles mean NOTHING, a conventional Scud is not a WMD unless it is has an NBC warhead. The ground was comtaminated by what? And BTW they do not build towers to dry anthrax, that is such a load of RUBBISH.
2006-12-30 18:03:14 · answer #4 · answered by mnztr 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's not the size of the size of the "missile'" that matters: it's what you do with it...
And that's actually my point: no such missiles were used to repel the US-led invasion. Why were no such missiles used? Because underneath it all Saddam really was a nice guy and didn't want to hurt anybody? Because he wanted the Americans to take over Iraq and subsequently to hang him?
What you suggest makes no sense.
2006-12-30 19:56:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt there were WMD, simply because if there had been, Saddam would have used them - either on his own people, his neighbors that were his 'enemies', or us (the latter being the least likely because we would be the most likely to retailiate in kind).
Just my opinion, though.
2006-12-30 18:09:45 · answer #6 · answered by Johnna L 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The smart one's know they are there ... it's just the spineless liberals and main stream media that promote the false stories about the lack of WMD's in Iraq.
2006-12-30 18:05:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey I believe you and God bless what you are doing in Iraq!!! And you are right and God did not give many people who answered your question a brain at all it seems.
2006-12-30 21:27:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
People belive facts, and the fact of the matter is that no weapons of mass destruction were found there.
2006-12-30 19:06:08 · answer #9 · answered by Jaff 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow - and why wasn't any of this reported by the news, or more importantly by the Bush administration.
It would have been a tremendous boost the the administration... one they desperately need.
So, lets apply Occam's Razor... oh - you're full of s**t...
Go away - lies do not befit you.
-dh
2006-12-30 17:58:56 · answer #10 · answered by delicateharmony 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋