You have answered your own question, that is , if they have any logic at all.
2006-12-30 17:46:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
The names have been changed to protect the guilty!
I have no compassion for Saddam, but I didn't want to see him made a martyr!
I have compassion for the Iraqi's we have killed or were killed because of us illegally attacking Iraq! 25,000 of our own military have been killed or wounded and we are making terrorist by the day in a country that had none before we got there!
Where is your overwhelming compassion for the 3, 248 brought home in body bags from Iraq! For what? Saddam was no terrorist and not one Iraqi had anything to do with 9/11! A lot of people to die to make 500 millionaires!
Where is your logic of attacking Iraq? You haven't any and we know it! And a good economy for some is not the answer!
2006-12-31 01:51:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
The ones who have compassion for Saddam and hatred for Bush - they are the ones who have not had a severe ***-beating in a very long time. They have forgotten or never knew what it's like to have a very real threat to their lives.
They are also the same ones that ridiculed Bush for not doing more to stop the 911 bombings. Now he's doing alot to stop the threat, and they can't stand that either. They don't know what they want, so they demand everything and are happy with nothing.
2006-12-31 01:56:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by bobo383 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't know a single Dem who has any compassion for Saddam or his 2 sons. I do know a lot of Repubs and Dems who are pissed off at all the blatant lies that the Bush administration told us as reasons for invading Iraq. A VERY big difference. I see you're not too good at comprehending even the most obvious of differences.
2006-12-31 02:01:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Gemini 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't feel compassion for Saddam. I'm so sick of people like you telling me what I feel and what I am because I'm labelled a liberal.
Go generalize somewhere else you immature fool.
2006-12-31 02:35:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
WHEN A HUMAN RESPONSE MAKES NO LOGICICAL REASONING...YOU ARE DEALING WITH A PERSON WHO'S TELLING YOU ONE THING BUT SAYING SOMETHING ELSE...THAT'S IF THEY HAVN'T LOST THEIR MIND.....LIBERALS WENT NUTS AFTER THEY WON ALMOST EVERY ELECTION ACROSS THE NATION CELEBRATING IN EVERY WAY....UNTIL CHARLIE RANGEL--HIGH RANKING DEMOCRAT ,WHO SAID THAT WE NEEDED TO START THE DRAFT IN ORDER THAT THESE RICH KIDS COULD EQUALLY FIGHT IN IRAQ LIKE ALL THE POOR ONES....THEY WOULDN'T ADMIT FOR A MINUTE THAT A FELLOW LIBERAL IS WRONG IN ANY WAY....BUT ARE THEY PISSED-OFF THINKING'' WHAT ME FIGHT IN THE ARMY I'M TOO VALUABLE FOR THAT''..THEN YOU HAVE TO CARRY OUT ANGER OF POSSIBLE BEING DRAFTED---TURN TO A DAMNED REPUBLICAN AND VERBALLY ' TAR & FEATHER THE SOB ' WELL AT THE TOP IS A DAMNED REPUBLICAN..TO HELL WITH THE TWIN TOWERS---IT'S ALL BUSH'S FAULT ESPECIALLY IF THAT SOB DRAFTS ME....BUUUTT SOME DAMNED DEMOCRAT IS GONNA PUT FORTH A BILL TO DRAFT THE LIBERALS AND THEY'RE DAMNED MAD...............
2006-12-31 02:07:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dave F 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
overwhelming liberal compassion?
do you ever get out of the house and actually talk to people because there is NO OVERWHELMING LIBERAL COMPASSION? (at best there are maybe 10 people on Yahoo Answers with some compassion and a few in San Fran)
again, Republicans clearly have no idea what is going on in the world... why am I not surprised...
keep it up... the crazy is showing...
2006-12-31 01:46:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
Looking at these liberals answering this Q I am starting to believe that these answers are coming from 1 sick twisted person there's no way there are that many sick perverted people in this world.
2006-12-31 01:55:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by josh m 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Yup, by the look of these answers you called that one right, including the kool-aid drinker who's quoting the Constitution.
2006-12-31 01:52:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by BlackWings5558 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
it was just inhuman the way they did it. they should of had bush along side him. bush has yet to prove Saddam had any weapons of mas destruction. buds only went in there because Saddam tried having his father killed. it was a vendetta on bush's part.
2006-12-31 01:48:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by loretta 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
It is very illogical.
Saddam would have killed them in a heartbeat, but they feel sorry for him.
And they call for the deaths of our President and Vice President.
That is Treasonous.
2006-12-31 02:00:42
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋