wrestling
2006-12-30 16:45:08 · 16 answers · asked by mason l 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
two complety different stiles but overall i would rather go to watch a live tna show. (lockdown in chicago hopefully)
2006-12-30 16:49:06 · answer #1 · answered by WaltMan89 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
TNA is wrestling, WWE is soap opera. Since I'm a wrestlingfan, I watch TNA. WWE sucks, I stopped watching it in 1999.
2006-12-31 06:31:59 · answer #2 · answered by iMPACT Player 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've watched TNA and admired the wrestling but for some reason can't get into it. I find nothing wrong with it, I just can't get myself interested in it. Although, WWE is at a horrible stage right now.
2006-12-30 17:06:15 · answer #3 · answered by Renae 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
WWE is a much better product. TNA is pretty much garbage with the V.K.M. skits and the LAX crap come on . They have a few guys with talent A.J. Styles, Christian and a few others. But how much longer will it be before Jeff Jarrett comes back off of his vacation and win their title again. WWE has better entertainers in the ring and on the mic. You can't polish a turd and TNA is a big smelly turd that even adding someone like Kurt Angle can't fix. TNA looks like the dieing days of WCW. Over payed lame acts ( VKM, Nash) , Main events that could sell out a high school gym , and alot of main event talent in the making A.J. Styles , Christopher Daniels that are not being pushed enough.
2006-12-31 17:20:09 · answer #4 · answered by mgorski77 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the two modern-day products that have been shown on television have not been good, yet WWE remains and continually would be a techniques extra suitable to TNA. All of WWE's 2010 PPVs have been good so a techniques.
2016-11-25 02:10:19 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
now tna coz
as i said in my question
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AnDWcXpgFZKOZ6_fbSqcRYzzy6IX?qid=20061230224222AAPcRCl
Do u think in wwe coz the feuds are no longer for the gold (world championship or IC or US or Cruiser Weight)?
it makes it boring. rember how stonecold used to fite for the gold, and wen he used to carry it u cud c d importance of it. the importance of the intercontinerntal championship bw rock and triple h. they arent ny more fights for the gold anymore. no division or particular ppl fighting for the same thing. every1 is fiting every1. wwe is just trying all the experiments and will just go ahead with whichever the fans will cheer more(which are most of d old feuds, which were for gold itself). dass wats diff in tna, at the end of it ur seeing angle and joe going for the gold, that makes it more worth watching
2006-12-30 17:47:15 · answer #6 · answered by soldieraman 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
tna cares about wrestling,wwe cares about movies,it's tna all the way.
2006-12-31 02:51:28 · answer #7 · answered by steeler nation!!!!!!! 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
WWE only because I perfer wrestling over rasslin.
2007-01-03 09:17:16 · answer #8 · answered by Leon Clemens 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE, I don't personally think TNA alone can top, ECW, Smackdown, and Raw.
2006-12-30 17:05:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
i think tna is more action packed with plenty more risk takers and they do more risk taking moves so i'll go with tna
2006-12-30 16:56:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋