2006-12-30 16:38:37 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
He takes time to think about it. He also takes time to study the evidence and what has been said before making a judgement
2006-12-30 16:41:42 · answer #1 · answered by lita ozzy bear 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Normally when a judge takes the case 'under advisement' it means that he is doing you a favor. The final judgement is not entered. If you should be caught doing another crime, he will come down with both of them.
In a traffic case, this means the points don't go against your driving record. If you commit another traffic violation, you will end up with points for both of them on your record. It can be considered sort of like probation for civil infractions.
2006-12-31 01:48:38 · answer #2 · answered by Aggie80 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It means the just will take some time to consider his ruling and make it at a later time. It happens quite often when the judge wants to reread the papers and consider further the arguments made by counsel.
2006-12-30 16:46:49 · answer #3 · answered by Carl 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
(((((Linz))))) i imagine there is judgment and then there is JUDGMENT. after I remind human beings, as i'm wont to do, that they are judging human beings in direct contradiction to the gospel they declare to adhere to (Mat 7:a million, e.g.), they typically come decrease back with something like "we make judgments each day. How will we not?" yet you're correct: having reviews,esp. at the same time as a persons movements threaten to damage you, or infringe on your rights, is not basically organic, that's mandatory. If someone says, "The Bible says to love one yet another and under no circumstances to guage, so, those those who're hating and judging and sneering, although they call themselves Christians, do not seem very Christian," it truly is an "I" truth it really is a more desirable of a truth-depending opinion about what I %. yet at the same time as someone says "because you do not use an same non secular terminology as I do, or because you eat meat on Fridays, or because you splatter as a change of dunk, you at the instantaneous are not saved and God will deliver you to hell," it truly is a judgment. it really is a 'you-truth' opinion that's presumptuous and smug. that's the style of judgment that Jesus talked about in Mat 7:a million etc. of route you frequently have the elementary zealot who believes that basically to disagree with him is a treacherous act of demoralizing judgment. they have an inclination to be those who've no theory that their own reviews would not be organic, unadulterated truth. In my adventure, those have a tendency to be the "blind-faithers" and when you consider that they are advised now to not imagine about their beliefs, they haven't any recourse to talk an honest opinion except to ***** that you're judging them through disagreeing. Sorry that's see you later. sounds like i can not say something in below 2500 words. No, i'm not lengthy-winded... I opt to imagine of it as *colloquial.* :)
2016-10-16 22:34:30 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Basically, he does not wish to make a decision at that time. He is going to research it, or think about it some more. It may be a matter of law, or of ethics, or his personal feelings he must sort through.
2006-12-30 16:42:02 · answer #5 · answered by Gary E 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it means he is waiting to see which side is willing to pay the most.
2006-12-30 16:45:12 · answer #6 · answered by bearbait7351 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋