now before i state anything i am a american citizen, but when i heard about the execution and the problems with korea i was aphauld. First off saddam should have not been executed, yes he killed hundreds but there are severeal others who have and are still leaders today, and we dont do anything about them.. i think we should have threw him in jail but the way it was done was very stupid and plus it gets me thinking why the heck are we there in the first place and what the heck did saddam have to do with bin laden the main puprose of the war. Second korea, i say we allow them to get nuclear weapons, and stop the fighting and sanctions because i believe north korea is not crazy enough to bomb us because they know that other countrys would be right there attacking, and this whole problem would be solved if we just let them have it, and its not like its effective yet but i still dont think thats too much of a worry unless they want a dead note and thats why i am upset with america.agree?
2006-12-30 16:20:06 · 6 answers · asked by Corey132 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
IMO you are very ignorant of world politics. I would agree that it may not have been the best to go into Iraq and destabilize the Middle East even further but allow rogue leaders to have nukes???? Ever heard of a leader having nothing much to lose or just being an extremist? Give North Korea a nuke and then what? They bomb South Korea maybe. Japan invades or the US bombs them. China comes to North Korea's aid. We start fighting China. Middle East countries join the fight. Other nations take sides.... World War lll.
Kind've like what may happen if and when Israel gets nuked/invaded. That is a much more likely beginning to a major war or a world war.
2006-12-30 17:03:52 · answer #1 · answered by Pete 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush just thought that Saddam was trying to destory the world, I think he should have gotten things straight with Iraq's ambassador first before execution or whatever, he only dealt on his own actions or what he saw was right. We need to find Bin Laden, but I think he is dead. North Korea is a small country and it just wants power and be reqonized by others so they threated us most likely, but then if we don't impose them there is a 5% chance of them bombing, but they would know the consqeunces as well so I think it was just a publicity act. Bush is a bit overreactive right now, but sometimes I think his IQ is really low based on his current choices, Saddam killed innocents, and Bush did too with the war, they are not different at all, Bush is only hiding by Saddam's death...
2006-12-30 17:01:12 · answer #2 · answered by jenniprncss 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I not only agree with you but appreciate the fact that as an American you have not been brainwashed by the media. You have made an intelligent analysis of your own. The US had no business of backing te execution of Saddam Hussein. After all, neither did Iraq have WMD not did they have Al Qaeda links. If Saddam had killed thousands, then it was for the Iraqi people to decide his fate. There are so many leaders in the world who are oppressive leaders. Can the US kill all of them. They won't, not if they dance to the US tune. Look at Bush. Isn't he responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent men. women and children in Afghanistan and Iraq? Who will hanf him and his sidekick Blair? Thank once again -- you have proved that the Americans are not bloodthirtsy bigots -- it is just your President.
2006-12-30 19:59:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Out of those 3 Iran is the only united states that has the armed forces strenght and an financial gadget to help a real conflict. Saddam might grow to be a lone gunslinger, with a view to visit conflict you are able to desire to ahve a minimum of one independent neighbor, no one interior the mideas grow to be a Saddam fan. Iran could desire to possibly address the two considered one of those countries they are usual in hte area, they have good weapons technologies and length and that they woudl pwn any of hte opposition. The North Korea at present could be no longer the only from 50 years in the past. the only element htey have in elementary is the fac they have the comparable weapons sytems. they are not arranged for twenty first century conflict. Iran borders to the east a nuclear power, and to teh west grow to be considered one of their swarn enemeies. as a result they have centred lots on their protection and maritime funds. Norht Korea as against Iraq may well be a greater a project yet North Korea might combat a lots bolder attack approach. They understand they eveything is on the line, as for supplies, as quickly as lower back supplies come variety allies. China is NK in simple terms actual best chum and as result a cut back off of supplies to NK may well be an casual assertion of conflict NK. So NK might have the skill to take care of its warmachine. besides the undeniable fact that Iraq has a lotmore enhance weapons technologies, and greater experienced and adventure commanders equiped with American made weaponry. So on the top of the day Saddam and his Elite Republican look after might instruct braveness and swat the Koreans down.
2016-10-28 19:03:35 · answer #4 · answered by lobos 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Saddam killed hundreds"? Try hundreds of thousands! I think it would be great if he could be executed for each life he took! Why don't you read, get some facts, then think? As for N. Korea having wmds, why don't you ask S. Korea what they think of that, since they would be the first recipients.
2006-12-30 17:14:19 · answer #5 · answered by bella 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I first regretted his hanging..But, after reading his biography, I think, he deserved it. It made me sad to know that he has not spared his sons-in-law too.
Regarding N Korea, I may agree with you.
2006-12-30 17:19:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋