ipod nano or video?

Question

which is better?

Answer 1

Certainly "ipod nano"-I recently bought one,the sound quality & picture quality is really great.

The iPod nano is Apple's fourth digital audio player combining features of both the iPod shuffle and iPod. It was introduced on September 7, 2005, replacing the iPod mini, which was discontinued on the same day. The replacement of the mini took Apple-related websites and the press completely by surprise since, although there were rumors about a new flash memory-based iPod, there was no prior notice of the popular mini being discontinued.
Work on development of the new design of the iPod nano started only nine months before the launch date. The iPod nano has more flash memory storage than is used in the iPod shuffle and has a miniaturized version of the color screen and click wheel found on the full-sized iPods. The screen also has a higher resolution than the old grayscale iPod, allowing one more line of text than the mini's screen. The battery and other internal parts were also reduced in size. The surface of the click wheel is slightly textured, allowing greater tactile feedback for out-of-sight operation. Unlike any other player in the iPod family, the iPod nano has a headphone-out situated in the bottom right of the player.

Answer 2

well i have a video. the nano would've been ok because i like music more than movies but the video is great. I don't really know 7,500 songs but i can put my favorite music videos on there. So i say video is better but i guess it depends on what you like. the nano holds a lot less. They're both good i think...one just holds videos, more songs and costs more.

Answer 3

I like ipod nano because ipod video is too big and bulky

Answer 4

the nano is smaller and, as you referred to, very attractive. it is likewise flash based, which will make it slightly extra good as there is no confusing tension to placed on out (no shifting factors). in spite of the undeniable fact that, merely as interior the older ipod mini, you pay so plenty extra $ in step with gb; besides the undeniable fact that the video function isn't all that useful, you will spend much less time futzing with your library (handbook updates, etc) with the bigger ability of the 30 gig. How massive is your library?... considering the undeniable fact that extra suitable 24 gig is ineffective in case you dont want it. I even have 60gb video, yet i gotta inform you- the assumption of "wearing around your dvd library" and connecting it to a much bigger visual show unit is crap, particularly because of the fact the low res ipod video format sounds like crap whilst considered on a "generic" length show. p.s there's a 6gb nano interior the works, if no longer already on the marketplace; it relatively relies upon on what you want to do with it, and for the money i think of the 30gb video is a extra helpful fee (besides the undeniable fact that larger and heavier).

Answer 5

IPod nano totally i love mine

Answer 6

Never had a video. They cost more and are difficult to put videos onto. Nano's are just plain awesome.

Answer 7

get one of those cool new colored ipod nanos.....trust me rarely ppl fill up their ipods...so dont worry about the song space..plus its like what 100 dollars cheaper and its tiny.

Answer 8

nano is much smaller, 8gb maximum.... video is bigger, plays videos, 60 gb

the price is another thing to consider.......

Answer 9

It depends...are you a more busy person who just wants it for the music, or do you have enough time to spend watching the movies?

Answer 10

Depends.