He was a steady rebounder and shot blocker but not top 50 NBA considering who's on that list and the numbers they put up.
2006-12-30 17:26:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I observed bill Walton play alot at UCLA, Portland and Boston. Of all the centers I truly have watched possibly none controlled a game to the degree that he did (have not seen adequate of Russel) while healthful. ruled the paint on protection like Olajuwon or Mourning and fairly efficient interior the placed up offencively, an surprising passer (had good help numbers yet they do no longer tell the full tale) diverse strikes, super hustle, surprising rebounder. At his suited he could desire to play at present and play properly, something like Alonzo Mourning in the past his ailment. He might out sensible and out hustle maximum of todays enormous adult adult males. He grow to be that solid. suitable 50 NBA gamers of all time, no way. in simple terms, he grow to be harm thank you to lots. If he had no longer been so injury services who is conscious, skills sensible I placed him someplace around Alonzo Mourning or Mosses Malone, greater effective than Dave Cowens, Willis Reed or Wes Unseld, yet no longer as solid as David Robinson or Patrick Ewing. No thank you to tell nonetheless, numbers mean jiffy injured lots. If he had stayed healthful he might progressed a perimeter game as he matured, he hit short financial employer photographs like Duncan, and gave the effect of he could desire to enhance his variety if mandatory. interior the top nonetheless its all in simple terms what could desire to have been.
2016-10-28 19:01:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by lobos 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
if you didn't notice in all the sports, the ex-ball players that become ANNOUNCERS that were somewhat good in the sport get that kind of recondition.....those ex-footballers get the hall of fame etc......so politics is involved....ESPN and others want a hall of fame, or 50 greatest to be announcers.....like you said " give me a break" there are and were better obscure players in the game
2006-12-30 16:03:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is a GREAT question! I would have to guess that it's just to educate people about who he is because he isn't a famous basketball player. He shouldn't be on the list, though!
2006-12-30 16:06:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by cbatress321 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is probably on their because he lead the Celtics to a lot of championships! Winning championships automaticaly puts you on a different level.
2006-12-30 16:52:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ed 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
same reason prince got into the r&r hall of fame. go figure.
2006-12-30 16:10:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by chris l 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
exactly, he was good but not great, definitely not top 50
2006-12-30 16:05:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by GHAAD 4
·
0⤊
0⤋