think: San Andreas Fault.
2006-12-30 15:43:26 · 10 answers · asked by [ΦΘΚ] PIяATE 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
We'll find out
2006-12-30 15:45:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Aha didn't the girls in charmed live in san fransisco, I loved that show when I was younger :D Nah, honestly, I've never thought about a stereotype for people there.
2016-03-29 01:34:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It can be very profitable if you live there temporarily and then move to someplace with a lower cost of living. You can easily afford a nice place outside of San Francisco once you sell your California house. But if you live there for awhile, the cost of living is incredibly high and as you said the chance for a catastrophic earthquake is ridiculously high... it really is pretty risky.
2006-12-30 15:51:33 · answer #3 · answered by KatGuy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lived in Calif (bay area) all my life. I'd rather deal with earthquakes any day than tornados. We've recently had a few little ones, didn't faze me at all. Why spend time worrying?
2006-12-30 15:50:49 · answer #4 · answered by moveandlose 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah. And the prices. Average house price, $700,000. Still, everyone who I've ever talked to who's lived or visited there absolutely loved it, so it's all relative.
2006-12-30 15:45:20 · answer #5 · answered by Underground Man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was in the 89 Quake in Oakland...it was a trip.....just rent !
2006-12-30 15:45:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
its actually the hayward fault we worry about. but its worth it, SF is the best
2006-12-30 15:52:57 · answer #7 · answered by Treezle 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was twice in the twentieth century.
2006-12-30 15:46:17 · answer #8 · answered by kman1830 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God only knows!
2006-12-30 16:20:16 · answer #9 · answered by Papa WILL 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not realy.
2006-12-30 15:46:18 · answer #10 · answered by scooprandell 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋