Just like the Title says.
RB2 Bush or Benson
WR2 Galloway or Furry?
2006-12-30 15:27:54 · 5 answers · asked by Tusin 1 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
I would have to go with
RB
I would go with Benson for 2 reasons.
1 - Cause Jones is coming off an injury. Bears already made the playoffs. The Bears will sit Jones alot of the game and they will be wanting to see what Benson can do. To get him ready for the playoffs.
2 - Bush may be benched part of the game were as Benson will be challenaged. Bears want Benson to step up.
WR
I would go with Galloway for 2 reasons.
1 - Roy Williams is going against the other Roy Williams from Dallas. Everyone scores passed Roy of Dallas. I see Kitna throwing to Williams alot because of that great mismatch. What this will mean is less throws to Furry.
2 - Galloway has great speed and he can bet seattle when the line holds for the QB allowing Galloway to break free. Galloway always has that deep threat in the game and I think we will see it here.
2006-12-30 16:01:25 · answer #1 · answered by thenolanater 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You couldn't go wrong with Bush or Benson both have favorable matchups. Benson will see a lot of carries due to the fact that the bears have nothing to play for, but Bush is on a roll lately and its hard to go agaisnt that. I would go with Bush but Benson would be a solid play cause they play the packers defense. At receiver i would go with Galloway ever since Rattay has taken over at quarterback Galloway has benefited. Furry will have an okay game but will not score, so Galloway will be the best play I can promise you that. I hope this helps you!
2006-12-30 15:58:18 · answer #2 · answered by Jimmy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Start Bush and Furry Bush because he is on a roll lately and furry because he averages like 4-5 receptions a game.
2006-12-30 15:39:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't comprehend approximately Galloway, yet Bush isn't a terrorist. Doing atrocious issues isn't the definition of terrorism. Terrorists intentially attack harmless civilians as a fashion to terrorize them into helping coverage replace. you may call Bush an imperialist, tyrant, or hypocrite in terms of respecting human existence, yet i don't think of terrorist is an ideal label.
2016-10-19 06:24:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Benson,
2007-01-03 11:06:34 · answer #5 · answered by jerry 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋