i mean wht has been goin on nothin said has made sense! i think she is goin out to make money off of it. from wht i read it said tht she didnt do all of wht she was asked and still wanted full pay but was refused and then later on she said she was raped but was found drunk in the backseat of her car!
2006-12-30 15:22:30 · 4 answers · asked by A to the T 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
The Accuser was offered thousands of dollars by the Rainbow Coalition, regardless of what happens with the case. She DECLINED their extremely generous offer and went back to work.
Your description of the case is not accurate. In addition, the ONLY case-related files that we have seen thus far are what have been filtered and interpreted by the DEFENSE, whose JOB is to try to hide anything that might implicate their clients from the public, to try to make the Accuser look uncredible, and to try to get the charges dropped - regardless of their clients' guilt or innocence. Out of OVER 2500+ pages of evidence, the Defense has released FEWER THAN 200 pages. WHAT is in the other 2300+ pages that the DEFENSE does NOT want us to see? We will find out at the trial.
2006-12-31 21:47:41 · answer #1 · answered by gelfling 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the Duke rape case was a grab for attention by a corrupt politician, the DA. He may now lose his license to practice law. To criminally charge people for your own political gain should be a crime itself.
2006-12-30 23:29:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Crossing and mixing kool-aid with Champagne, never a good idea.
2006-12-30 23:30:32 · answer #3 · answered by cold runner 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a botched attempt to make some money.
2006-12-31 21:42:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋