English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ater all he did orchestrate the execution of a very evil man, you gotta admit Bush has balls right?

2006-12-30 14:58:47 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

26 answers

no. he is trying to cover up his own mistake.

2006-12-30 15:00:33 · answer #1 · answered by myangelbarry 1 · 6 6

George Bush has no balls or brains. He is a killer if any thing at all. He is not better than Saddam, millions of innocent people are dying still because of G Bush stupid decision to go to war in Iraq. The American Government and G bush administration has caused a lot of problem and chaos to the rest of the world. Saddam deserves what happen to him and sooner or later he would have paid the price for what he did to his people. If Saddam had committed hundreds of crimes against his people while he ruled Iraq. Well I must say George Bush has made matters worst by killing millions in the past few years. The Bush administration has caused more killing since they arrived in Iraq. At least thousands of people where not dying every single day while Saddam was the president. I'm against Saddam too but Mr. Fool Bush is no Hero here. The real enemy to Man kind his George Bush. If Bill Clinton was still the American president none of this **** would have happen. George Bush has done enough damages to the rest of the world and to his own people. They should not interfere in other peoples business at all. Obviously the only reason they do so this is for their own interest and greed. George Bush has created hate and fear among is people and the rest of the world. Ever since he came to ruling nothing good has happen. . The best thing to do is hang him he has no right to be amongst the living.

2006-12-31 00:04:41 · answer #2 · answered by julia1975 4 · 2 0

Bush orchestrated Saddams execution? Wow, thats a different version than what every major news network has said today. The Iraqis put Saddam on trial. The Iraqis controlled the execution.

2006-12-30 23:52:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I would think it was good if we got the right man. Everyone keeps forgetting that the man we should be trying to find and sentence to death is Osama Bin Laden (you know, the guy behind the Sept.11th attacks). Instead of wasting our time, lives, and tax dollars on a man who was obviously no threat to the United States (We did take over Iraq in three days). Open you eyes people Bush may have big balls but he has no brain.

2006-12-31 01:03:14 · answer #4 · answered by Shawn B 1 · 0 0

It seems that no one really looks at the big picture with Iraq. It seems like most every one is focused on one or two things not everything about that place. For starters when we invaded Iraq most of the country was starving and very poor because Saddam would take the food and money and bring it back towards Baghdad. there is more to this war than most people realize. You can not believe much about what is reported to you on the news. They don't tell the whole story.

2006-12-30 23:41:48 · answer #5 · answered by christopherjones43 1 · 0 1

Wow, I've been wondering what all of the deaths were about, Bush's plan to capture Saddam! Thanks. I've heard he planed it all clear back from the towers explosion. I bet he ran for president just so he could go after Saddam. Yep, I sure wouldn't want him mad at me!

Actually I'm pissed about the Free Trade Agreements that have been draining our jobs for the last 30 years, who gives a cra* about Saddam and Iraq. I feel for our soldiers but we have been fighting somewhere for the last 150 years.

Peace

2006-12-30 23:05:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

well i cautiously support saddam's capture...but not defenetly a pro bush.......the way iraq was captured voilates intrnational human rights and laws........it was against the democratic view of united nations.
if bush wants to talk about democracy ........then he should first learn to respect the democratic decisions at united nations............if he wants to talk about secularism.......... he should first learn to respect the religious rights of palestina and muslim countries.

saddam was a dictator and he deserved conviction ...but it should not be seen in the light of bush's "war against terror".............we should rember that he was not a terrorist...but a cruel dictator

2006-12-30 23:27:43 · answer #7 · answered by revanth 1 · 1 0

He has the balls to go after terrorists, and kill em dead. The Iraqis are the ones that wanted Saddam dead, and so quickly. You are right. Bush has balls, and it should be making every terrorist shake in his boots.

2006-12-30 23:11:28 · answer #8 · answered by mojojo66 3 · 1 1

yeppers his decision as well as most of congress at the time made the right choice to take Saddam down was the right one! No matter if he didn't find WMD!

2006-12-30 23:17:34 · answer #9 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 1 1

Bush is 999 BILLION times better than Saddam.

2006-12-30 23:09:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

bush did it for the Iraqi people. we Americans had nothing to do with them hanging him. bush was in bed when they executed him. the news said this about 2 am in the morning. lets stop gloating about a killing. let god handle it now.

2006-12-30 23:11:13 · answer #11 · answered by loretta 4 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers