English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If so why america and his penis UN can't solve the killing of minority by singhala majority in Srilanka more than 25 years ? Because in sri lanka they dont have OIL to steel ! What do u think?

2006-12-30 14:54:09 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

21 answers

No, I think he should have been beaten and tortured on a daily basis and given a blood transfusion to keep him alive if necessary to keep him alive to suffer these daily beatings etc, I am sure there would be many people agree with me, especially those of his victims and their relatives.

2006-12-30 15:14:19 · answer #1 · answered by shotie 3 · 2 1

I don't know how you related Sadama Husain to Sri Lanka.......I wonder whether he even knew where Sri Lanka is...........

And.....Sinhala majority are not killing minority people in Sri Lanka. Minority includes Tamils, Muslims, Malay, burger. Are you telling that Sinhalese are killing all these people.

Get your facts right….Don't mislead the public......the war is between LTTE terrorist and the Sri Lankan government. LTTE has been categorized as an international terrorist group........I guess I don't have to explain any further..

You are either a support of LTTE or you are a South India Tamil who has an opinion about USA, United Nations and Sri Lanka.

Keep your nose out of Sri Lankan business........

Good day to you

2007-01-01 21:25:23 · answer #2 · answered by phalastinaa 4 · 1 0

Minority in SL will continue to be unfortunate in facing the consequences of tamil tigers' (LTTE) terrorism and suicide attacks in majority areas. As far as I know, singhala majority do not kill the minority, however the Sri Lankan governement is duty bound (as is any elected government) to protect its citizens from terrorism. So if you take up terrorism in Sri Lanka, you will die.
.
I can also pose your question in a different way:
"Why can't US + UN stop LTTE terrorism in Sri Lanka?"
Feel better now?

2006-12-31 05:56:39 · answer #3 · answered by Calculus 5 · 1 0

I am not sure that they have really hung him. Though I am a European I feel there is too much going on. The Americans fooled us once with Under Capricorn. They have so much influence and cannot catch Bin Laden. Both Sadam and Bin Laden were Bush;s friends so can you really believe that he has been hung?
If Bush is protecting Bin Laden then shouldnt Bush be taken to task?
If Saddam was hung and was Bush's friend at one time is it worth having a friend like Bush?

2006-12-31 01:02:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

antiterror88 idiot, Gosh I read all that is wirtten, about the steps for democracy that the States take. What about Rawanda, Mugabi, what about Musharraf, all in their way are taken as acceptable I presume.

Mugabi and Musharraf are dictators, there was no vote, and everyone turned a blind eye at Rawanda.

What about the hypocacy and lies that befall the States.

For a start they are the ones who sat Saddam into power, they are the ones who supplied the weapons, but if he was able to tell this, it would have been a disaster for the States.

Better he dies..........

2006-12-31 03:52:06 · answer #5 · answered by kirsun10 4 · 0 0

the execution of Saddam was authored by the us imperialists and implemented by its puppet government in Iraq which will exacerbate sectarian violence in Iraq. it was definitely a travesty of justice,because the judges were transferred , the defense lawyers murdered. the USA invaded Iraq with a pretext that Iraq had WMDs but could not find out . after the invasion of the imperialist forces, more than 6,00,000 Iraqis were killed. when Saddam ruled the country, there were no religious terrorists, but now it had become a hot bed for religious terrorists and sectarian violence between shias and Sunnis. THE CRUELEST DICTATOR OF CHILE AUGUSTO PINOCHET GOT NATURAL DEATH. THE MILITARY JUNTA OF MYANMAR STILL RULING. AS LONG AS THE DICTATORS ARE IN GOOD LOOKS OF THE USA AND REMAIN AS THE RUNNING DOGS OF IMPERIALIST FORCES, AND DO NOT ANTAGONIZE THEM, THOSE DICTATORS WILL REMAIN IN FORCE. Saddam was one of few secular rulers of the world died like a MARTYR.why will the usa and unsend troops to srilanka ? WHAT CAN THEY GAIN BY DOING SO IN SRILANKA? NO OIL NO INTERVENTION.

2007-01-03 02:09:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes I do, this so called human being told his followers to kill their own kind..told soldiers to video tape how he killed his victims and would send copiesto the relatives so they can see how they were torchered, cut babies out of pregnant women, people are just seeing a sad old man being hung..but isnt that what he has done for years..

2006-12-31 04:34:46 · answer #7 · answered by fran 5 · 0 0

Yes

2006-12-31 01:23:00 · answer #8 · answered by richard_beckham2001 7 · 0 0

I agree,even though he was a tyrant,he never really bothered us,now our troops are out there getting bombed and killed and the iraqis are running riot,dont get me wrong,im not a fan of his,but i dont agree with our men out there,when no weapons of mass destruction were ever found,bush seemed to want to be seen making someone pay for sept 11th,why didnt he wait and kill that bastard bin laden

2006-12-30 23:05:11 · answer #9 · answered by NATALIE W 3 · 1 1

Not at all. The News is too great and too difficult to believe. I hope it is really true! A life long Zionist agent is hanged by the Zionists!!! Difficult to swallow! The Execution drama is a piece of cake for those who control Hollywood. Sometime ago an American youngster had produced such video and released all over the world. I myself listened to news on Radio Pakistan in Islamabad. later it was confirmed that it was a hoax made by amateur artist.
My reasons are as follows:

* Saddam was a CIA agent from the age of about 16 years
* He was an Isamili and not a Muslim just like Hafiz Asad , Bashar Asad and Qaddafi
* He was brought in power by CIA
* He was used by Zionists rulers of America for attack on Iran and Kuwait and to rob these countries as well as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other Gulf countries.
* Saddam was a die hard Bathist i.e. member of Bathist party founded by Michael Aflaq who was son in law of Israeli Prime Minister Goldameir . The main aim of Bathists was like Ata Turk and Musharraf to divide Muslims. He raised the slogan "Arabs first" to create a division among Muslims. Zionist consider Muslims only obstacle in their way because Muslims alone possess uncontaminated and totally protected book of the God All Mighty Allah and which can foil all their conspiracies

If the news is correct then it is great as Saddam deserved the treatment and we hope other agents of the Zionists will also meet the same end. If it is all drama even then Saddam is publicly finished. He may live as ghost.

After seeing 9/11 and drama of Weapons of Mass destruction you can understand the extent of American Wrestling Matches. Indian also played the same drama when they killed the entire royal family of Nepal using face masks. One of their agent acted as Nepali prince and created a Bollywood drama of failed love affair. No autopsy was permitted although Nepal had American qualified competent pathologists. The fault of Nepal's royal family was that the hijacked Indian plane had some links with Nepal.

Whatever the case the news is too great. Allaho Akbar! What a present on this Eid Ul Adha ( Afestival Muslims are observing all over the world right now in memory of great sacrifice of Abraham of his son Ishmaeel. The God All mighty accepted the sacrifce and saved Ishmaeel. Muslims sacrifce a goat or a lamb. Teh Jews and Chrsitians also had this festival but vanished among them)





--
Anwar Ul Haque

2006-12-30 23:00:59 · answer #10 · answered by antiterror88 1 · 1 3

I don't think killing Saddam (Bushes old friend)or anybody else solves anything. I don't know the Sri Lankan story, but I agree with your last sentence. $ OIL $

2006-12-30 23:04:38 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers