English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

no. if you were trying to prove Murphy's law nothing would go wrong, thereby ruining your experiment and making it a success.

shitt. sounds like Rumsfeldian logic. and that vein in my head is throbbing again.

2006-12-30 13:33:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You got it. To summarize Murphy's Law, if something can go wrong, it will and at the worst possible moment!

2006-12-30 13:22:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

That in itself would solve Murphy's Law, wouldn't it?
The only way to disprove it would be to prove it by having nothing go wrong.
Wow, real mind twister there.

2006-12-30 13:22:16 · answer #3 · answered by Lady Ettejin of Wern 6 · 2 0

Garp had a problem with Murphy's Law when a plane flew into his house.

2006-12-30 13:27:43 · answer #4 · answered by Mary W 5 · 1 0

Explain to me how I'm supposed to "solve a law" and I'll answer youir question.

2006-12-30 13:23:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes, you'll break your pencil, drop the law on your toe, slam your head into the wall, squish your finger in the desk drawer, and pull your hair out in exasperation!

2006-12-30 13:23:45 · answer #6 · answered by jabbergirl 4 · 1 0

yes.

2006-12-30 13:21:29 · answer #7 · answered by scooprandell 7 · 1 0

YEP, GO FIGURE!

2006-12-30 13:30:53 · answer #8 · answered by Penny Mae 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers