English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

from another answer.......Ask why they believe in killing babies, giving money to those who are lazy, allowing animal rights, demoralizing the troops, and tolerating gays? Why are these the only issues in the popular politics? It seems people only care about these,,,,,,are not these basically insignificant compared to allowing corporations and the super wealthy to have too much power over the political arena...

2006-12-30 13:11:59 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

One of the reason that things like abortion and gay equality are NATIONAL issues to the voters is because the U.S. Supreme Court has misinterpreted the Constitution on those subjects and turned them into national policy.

If you want the Congress to focus only on issues which are of national importance, tell the Supreme Court to do it's job right and stop misinterpreting the Constitution as regards to abortion and gay rights so that those issues can be dealt with solely on the state level, where they belong.

2006-12-30 13:17:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There are people who wanted to kill babies to serve their selfish interest. Politicians gave money to the lazy because they want to get their votes. People allow animal rights because they want to protect their pets. People criticize military actions because they are against the politicians that sent them to war and many tolerate gays because they want to get the sympathy of the gays for their votes. People are just interested in other issues to serve their selfishness and create disunity.

2006-12-30 21:18:11 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

We ARE the corporations.

Half of us work for them, most have stock in the company -hence "are" the company, and are everyday, decent people.

Put this issue at the bottom of the list. Let's get back to discussing dead babies.

2006-12-30 21:17:43 · answer #3 · answered by Action 4 · 0 0

You are advocating a fascist overthrow. And don't give me that crap about the new definition of fascism. I'm old enough to remember the real one.

2006-12-30 21:25:51 · answer #4 · answered by Shrink 5 · 0 0

You've basically condemned talking about Republican talking points in favor of a single Democrat talking point..

2006-12-30 21:22:01 · answer #5 · answered by Josh 4 · 1 0

???... what?? are you tripping again? The question is to rambling to answer with any clarity... so pass the joint and quit Bogarting..

2006-12-30 21:37:59 · answer #6 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers