you should just make like a tree and get outta here!!!!
2006-12-30 12:36:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr Bellows 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Bush replaced into no longer in charge of the Iraqi government, the trial, or the execution. the US militia have been asked to hold Saddam prisoner in basic terms because of the fact it replaced into the terrific way for the Iraqi government to verify he does no longer be busted out of reformatory through his gang. This replaced into needless to say a real risk. however the US militia became Saddam over to Iraqi government officers for the execution. i think Bush expressed some unhappiness on the taunting previous to the execution. i observed that when the witnesses began chanting "Moqtada," Saddam laughed. He ought to assume the way forward for our dating with the Mahdi military! Evil he would have been, yet no longer stupid. even regardless of the indisputable fact that i think of it ought to have been stable that a minimum of the various witnesses have been Sadr supporters; they'd be tremendously credible witnesses to the actuality that Saddam Hussein replaced into particularly lifeless.
2016-12-15 11:55:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with the point you are making why is it that this former leader was executed for orders given in what him and his country believed a war.When so many other world leaders do it everyday with impunity.
The bottom line is though Saddam wasn't killed to satisfy the people of Iraq (who in fact are very opposed to the American occupation of their country),he was killed because George Bush wanted it that way.Because over a decade ago Saddam made his daddy look bad.
Saddam was murdered by George Bush's decree.
Executions are act of justice this was not an act of justice it was an act of vengeance making it a murder.
2006-12-30 12:45:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Celticprince 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
For one thing, Bush has not ordered the death of civilians. We are at war. Guess what happens during war? People die. It is a shame that civilians and soldiers die, but that is the price of freedom.
Saddam actually condemned the people to death, he even killed his own step-son.
Get your facts straight. While you're at it, stop being ignorant.
2006-12-30 12:37:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by May 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Perhaps after Castro and our own operative Bin Laden-
Texas is the leader in executions - i would watch out for my OWN neck before I started wondering where Bush is gonna rest his.
2006-12-30 12:47:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by watcherd 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
omg.....excuse me..you have no right to say any of this. please dont insult these two great men. ariel sharon? why does he deserve to be killed. i am just so disgsted by this question. im sorry, i really dont remeber bush and sharon saying or wanted civilians to be killled. you, a human being, should not be thinking about this stuff? how were you brought up? i msorry, this comment question wtvr should not be asked, absolutly not called for. i am sooo sooo upset. you insulted me a ton. maybe you should think about what you say before you actually say it. no joke...you are seroisly saying this? i cant beleive what ppl have become. americans....i am so ashamed to be one.
2006-12-30 14:39:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Sadly, George Bush will never be made on this earth to pay for his hideous crimes against humanity, at least not by our governemnt or justice system.
I have no sympathy at all for middle-easterners whom have died in Bush's "war to make money for his family by controlling middle eastern oil" , had it been me in charge we would have simply incinerated them.
Bush's absolute rape of a living culture is obscene, and while justice will not punish him, I am certain Karma will.
2006-12-30 12:45:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by aural_exstacy 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
The fact you can post this in this room and your still alive proves that Bush is infact doing his job well.
2006-12-30 12:36:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by xx_muggles_xx 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
If you voiced this opinion about Saddam in Iraq when he was in power, you would already be in his dungeons and they would be heating the tongs to red hot. You, well knowing that your audacity had cost your loved ones their lives also, know that you will never leave those dungeons. This is freedom and it is what we fight for. Until you have laid your life on the line to fight for this precious precious freedom, don't be too quick to criticize those who do and have.
2006-12-30 12:52:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jim N 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
bush is fighting a war there is a difference. saddam committed a crime. that why they put him to death.
2006-12-31 16:12:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ive 3 word for you nwo: new world order and bush has begun it
2006-12-30 12:36:43
·
answer #11
·
answered by padraig 3
·
0⤊
1⤋