When he was superstar ant could have maed fortun for production company wit an exclusive,
I would haf put him in ground wit noose rount nek and other ent hitch to Dodge viper, 100 metre rope, back up 100 meter ten flat out and film hed com off, get catholic priste gif last rite fust, do at drag strip sel ticket fil grantstant as wel, How you wood haf don it?
2006-12-30 12:31:55 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Dynamite down foat, not bad.
Hey, don criticise mi engelish, som peeples unterstant, you try maek you self unterstod in mi cuntery fore yu take pies
2006-12-30 12:42:10 · update #1
Sacha Baron Cohen is a lot funnier than you.
2007-01-02 02:59:18 · answer #1 · answered by musonic 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well he never was a superstar, just a punk murderer. But getting the death penalty is what most of these murderers want, all over the world day after day it happens, so we give them what they want and give them a death penalty and kill them.
First of all If you are a Christian and believe in his teachings in hte Bible.. Don't forget thy shall not kill.
I think we should have special prisons for murderers, where they work 18 hours a day at hard hard labor. Find something they can do to make enough to pay for their keep. If they cooperate feed them well. If they do not, feed them poorly. Prison for murderers should be toughest there is.
Saddam didn't deserve the easy way out, he should be crying out in pain with hard labor every single day until he dies of that naturally. That would stop a lot of people from murdering others.
2006-12-30 20:57:42 · answer #2 · answered by DAVID T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can somebody translate that jibber-jabber for me?
I know...I know. Im gonna get another one of those violation things from Yahoo stating my response was an insult and not a answer. But i dont care. I will file them with the 50 others i get everyday in my trash.
2006-12-30 20:35:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sensibly, I think that no one deserves to be intentionally killed but on this occasion justice has been done against him by the only way that he himself knew and practised. The taking of any life is sad but on this occasion I think that closure has occurred. My only comment is that the world becomes a little wiser as a result. I don't want to spend the rest of my life where violence is common but I doubt if we will ever truly learn .....
2006-12-30 20:37:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your English is so bad it is almost impossible to understand.
Since your first question was coherent, the answer I offer is that Saddam was, at his heart, a common criminal and deserved to die as such.
2006-12-30 21:17:33 · answer #5 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why did all the leftie liberals join the 'don't hang Saddam' bandwagon. They were very keen to hang Nazis at Nuremberg.
2006-12-30 20:42:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
LMAO
I would get stick a piece of dinamite down his throat on public television
2006-12-30 20:35:38 · answer #7 · answered by nick w 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Things get really wierd on answers at this time of night.
2006-12-30 20:33:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Simple answer. The man was a common thug.
2006-12-30 20:37:56 · answer #9 · answered by Rich B 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Saddam was NOT a superstar. He WAS a common criminal!
2006-12-30 20:33:39 · answer #10 · answered by woundbyte 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋