How would Saddam Hussein been able to use chemical weapons against the kurds if the US and the UK hadn't sold

Question

them to him?

Answer 1

He wouldn't have. We supplied Saddam with the weapons he used against the Kurds.

The US Senate's committee on banking, housing and urban affairs -- which oversees American exports policy -- revealed that the US, under the successive administrations of Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr, sold materials to Iraq including anthrax and VX nerve gas. Other bacteria sold included brucella melitensis, which damages major organs, and clostridium perfringens, which causes gas gangrene.

The shipments to Iraq went on even after Saddam Hussein ordered the gassing of the Kurdish town of Halabja, in which at least 5000 men, women and children died. The gassing took place in March 1988, but a month later the components and materials of weapons of mass destruction were continuing to arrive in Baghdad from the US.

The fact remains: the largest stockpiles of chemical weapons are in the USA.

Answer 2

How might want to helping a fashionable assassin ever be "moral" (except, for sure, contained in the eyes of politicians who stood to line their wallet nicely from such institutions)? I heard there change right into a photo circulating on youtube various years in the past that confirmed a photo from 1991 of Osama bin encumbered sitting at a picnic table at Bush's Crawford Ranch in Texas. Ten years later, he's global Enemy #a million. If that photo change into real (i might want to in no way locate it), what the hell extremely is going on?

Answer 3

If saddam pulled up in a ice cream van and killed the kurds by selling them completely addictive and deadly ice cream, that tactic would have been perfectly freemarkety fine.

(Tobacco kills millions upon millions precisely this way, yet no-one even gets arrested)..

Answer 4

the US and the UK arent the only people to sell them weapons in the past. plus the US doesnt really use chemical weapons

Answer 5

but, but he obeyed our orders then.