if most of the people are against war on Iraq, what is the procedure inorder to charge Bush and Blair with war crimes ? are they accountable ? can they be charged for misleading and deceving ppl ?
2006-12-30 10:16:48 · 16 answers · asked by mark d 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
According to the rule of law, yes they can. They started a war against the UN resolutions, thereby becoming outlaws themselves, knowing full well that the world would not do a darn thing about it. How do you prosecute? That is out of my expertise or experience, I would think the world court in The Hague, but who finances them?? The only way to do it in my opinion is to vote them out of office. Some would say they will be living with the profits of crime, tsk tsk.
2006-12-30 10:29:54 · answer #1 · answered by P.A.M. 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Charges of committing war crimes can not be based upon popular opinion.
I do not care for either Bush or Blair or their war in Iraq. However I do not believe they have committed any war crimes.
Bush's real crime was dismantling the Constitution under false pretenses - not a war crime but a crime against the American public.
2006-12-30 10:27:08 · answer #2 · answered by Bad M 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ok and what "war crimes" do you refer to? People were mislead, and deceived by the Great Liar Bill Clinton for 8 straight years. A bold face, under oath liar.
2006-12-30 10:24:29 · answer #3 · answered by Eye of Innocence 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
sure he would desire to i'm not anti war yet i'm against the invasion of Iraq based on the Lies that Tony Blair &Co advised. uk /u . s . allegedly have the final intelligence collecting interior the worldwide MI5/MI6/CIA/SIS/FBI so if the Iraqi's had WMD why have been they not waiting to pinpoint the places and direct those inspectors on the instant to them. could the u . s . enable a russian delegation of inspectors into all their sites of WMD i doubt it. How could the u . s . and Britain experience if the troops of distant places government pulled down the statues of their leaders. The BBC gave Tony's spin on Saddam's crack royal look after the place are they if the existed there would desire to have been lots of folk killed that the united kingdom u . s . have not admitted to killing became it ideal to search out his sons execute them and parade their bodies could blair like this to ensue to his kinfolk he became basically as huge a tyrant as Saddam in his own way
2016-10-19 06:02:19 · answer #4 · answered by leong 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, they can be charged with war crimes if and when they ever commit one. you little commie anti american sissies wouldn't know a criminal act if it kicked you in the head. Neither Bush nor Blair mislead anyone. Any errors in intelligence occured in the CIA and other intel agencies
2006-12-30 10:36:06 · answer #5 · answered by iberius 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Anybody can be charged with anything. Convicted? No. Not without committing a crime.
2006-12-30 10:51:56 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ift weed dade weed hang us a Klinton anda Carrey 2 case tem paple voteed 4 war.
2006-12-30 10:24:19 · answer #7 · answered by MOLLY 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
While President Bush is a one Great Man I don't think he has done all some would like give him credit for
2006-12-30 10:45:01 · answer #8 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I believe that they are guilty of MANY crimes. After WW2 there was Nuremberg trials and there should be for this war as well.
2006-12-30 10:22:28 · answer #9 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yes to reach the justice as they say but you forget the third of the triangle Sharon may god be with him as a human im not get happy when peoples have bad illness but i hope to recover to face that trial with them
2006-12-30 10:22:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋