English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

George Bush said that the purposed of invading Iraq was to get rid of Sadam, So is the mission over? Now the Iraqui people have a new goverment, so why not to let them manage their own business. Is would be easy for the United States to get out of Iraq?

2006-12-30 09:02:42 · 11 answers · asked by The Most Beautiful Men 1 in News & Events Current Events

11 answers

Find Osama. But....no matter what they do, it will never be over. There will always be evil men to take their place.

2006-12-30 14:22:31 · answer #1 · answered by ksgirl 3 · 0 0

With Sadam now being executed, though Bush had nothing to do with the trial and decision to execute, his efforts of finishing what his father couldn't for the gulf war has now been accomplished. Sadam captured and eliminated.

We should bring our troops home and let the Iraq's settle their differences. Without the USA in the picture perhaps they will not want to fight as much, we have fueled the fires by being there.

We need to tighten our own security with Sadam's execution, there were threats that we would have to pay for his death. But not with homeland security.

Time to move on USA for our own sake. Stand tall and patriotic for our own country and its needs.

2006-12-30 09:15:56 · answer #2 · answered by Cat 3 · 0 0

the xm8 from what i comprehend became dropped with the aid of the army for destiny deveopment, now H&ok are bobbing up a much extra good and effective ar-15. They call it the HK416. It basicly an m4 on steroids. the only factors it shares with the the present m16/4 is the barrel and set off assembly. The decrease reciever, bolt, buffer, gasoline gadget, have entirly redesigned to be able to shoot after the weapon has been dropped in sand and water suitable away with out cleansing first. Plus it is converted to something from 11.5" barrel to a 24" sniper sytem barrel. it could additionally be used to fireside the AK .308 around instead of the NATO 5.fifty six. there is likewise the Barrett M468 yet merely seem that one up

2016-11-25 01:27:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I honestly believe we should have a deadline now of when we are bringing our troops home. That will give the Iraqi people notice and get them up and running and maybe they will do it quicker knowing when we are leaving. I just believe that now with Saddam out of the way there will be more violence but we need to bring our troops home and let the Iraqi people handle their own government. Why are we responsible for all the other countries? Other countries need to start taking care of themselves. It's time to bring our troops home and start focusing on our own country and government.

2006-12-30 09:18:08 · answer #4 · answered by Amber W 1 · 1 0

I think its worth watching for awhile to see what the reaction in Iraq is, then slowly bring the troops home.

Make sure there is some stability there first.

2006-12-30 09:08:51 · answer #5 · answered by kurticus1024 7 · 1 0

we should bring our troops home, by way of Iran and N. Korea taking out those other 2 evil little bastards leading those countries but leave some troops in Afghanistan to hunt down that dog OBL

2006-12-30 10:13:41 · answer #6 · answered by hairpoor 2 · 0 0

The US will be in Iraq and Afghanistan for several more years........

2006-12-30 09:06:42 · answer #7 · answered by cajunrescuemedic 6 · 0 0

No mission is not over. We are still there looking to strike it rich with oil..

2006-12-30 09:10:19 · answer #8 · answered by ........ 5 · 0 1

Get all troops of Iraq ASAP so no more die!

2006-12-30 09:12:06 · answer #9 · answered by realsaltlake_chica 2 · 0 1

Too many young lives have been lost.Time to leave.

2006-12-30 09:26:33 · answer #10 · answered by melbournewooferblue 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers