When will Bush get his hanging for his crimes on humanity?

Answer 1

never happen,he always plays the good against evil card and the
suckers believe him.He should be investigated for the war in Iraq
at the very least.

WMDs-lie
imminent danger-lie
we want to help Iraq-lie
terrorist threat-lie

truth
only nuclear materials used-depleted uranium shells(us tanks)
we want to help ourselves to Iraqi oil(fact)
terrorist threat-only since USA invaded(fact)
we want to change the oil for euros back to dollars(fact

Answer 2

So lets hang President Bush, you sound like the Sad-Dam Iraqi dictator that use to kill the messenger that brought him bad news. President Bush stepped up and did what know one else had the guts to do. He stepped on an ant pile in the middle east, do you honestly think that Iraq is worse off now. No one would help those people, except for the brave soldiers that are fighting. Maybe the next American President will be a Democrat, and when the world call on us you will (the Brits) will just have to go it alone. Support our troops support your troops. Do you honesty believe that America would have been loved by the world if we didn't act. God Bless America

Answer 3

that's actual that George bush has committed crimes against humanity yet yet you are able to no longer carry close him as he's the president of u . s . a . (whether you do no longer handle him so). Now you've understood the adaptation between progressed countries and coming up countries. countries that are progressed can exercising their power on the arrival up countries. besides the undeniable fact that i think of that george bush is feeling as though he's the only guy or woman who can do away with terrorism in this international. consequently he's performing like that. I nevertheless ask your self why he has have been given a 2nd term as president of u . s . a .. perhaps he has accomplished no errors different than affirming wars on different countries. Going by utilising the present events, i think of that Pakistan is next in line for an attack by utilising u . s . a . ( George Bush)

Answer 4

Not until he's crashed the US economy & forced a currency move to the Amero.

Bush has put America into critical debt, tied down the military in an illegal war, destroyed the US credibility, made the nation a terrorist target etc.

Bin Laden could never do that much damage. So why remove Bush yet?????

Answer 5

Not hardly.
However, I am in favor of any legislation brought forth that would prevent any member of the Bush family from holding an elected or appointed office (on any level) for the next 1000 years.

Answer 6

Soon I would like to think. I do believe he may have passed a law that prevents him being punished for something he did in office. Blair and his government should also face trial for the war crimes they have committed in the name of British people. It will not happen and we the people are to blame.

Answer 7

I really like your question and I'd love it if it is a proposal...lol
In a real case I'm against giving the death to punish someone who did the same. I think the freedom is a such an important thing that if u put someone into jail is the better punishment 4 whoever.

Answer 8

Bush may win the Nobel Peace Award.
He is humanities best chance for survival.
Count your blessings for Bush.

Answer 9

Please! What an ignorant question. BTW, I don't care if this answer costs me points or not.

Bush is far better than any dictator that I've ever heard of. I didn't vote for him, nor do I agree with him, but, I certainly do not want him hung.

Answer 10

never, he's just going to stand there looking all innocent, fighting for world peace & bringing the dictaors to justice lol....not to mention bringing order & stability to the Middle-east.
Such great men go down in history, like ehmm Winston Churchil, who helped to start the anti-west movement in the middle-east, the cunning, liar.