2006-12-30 08:34:18 · 9 answers · asked by Rhea 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
because he was killed according to iraqi law and the iraqi constitution established death by hanging. however, the iraqis are bound to have problems w human right activists because he was not killed in a "humane" way, aka, via lethal injection.
2006-12-30 08:37:23 · answer #1 · answered by prettyme 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lethal Injection what are you talking about, i think he deserved more such as being killed with rocks
2006-12-30 16:41:29 · answer #2 · answered by Nando 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because for one the lethal injection is no pain and kills him fast.
In my opinion i say snapping his neck was least pain he deserved, i would have tortured him for weeks and let him die of a long painful tortured death.
but thats my opinion :D
2006-12-30 16:57:32 · answer #3 · answered by babygirl07 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because that's how Iraq does their executions. This isn't the U.S. But, why does it matter how he was taken out? Either one ends in death and that's what his sentence was.
2006-12-30 16:39:07 · answer #4 · answered by chickmomma5 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe it's Iraqi law.
2006-12-30 16:48:16 · answer #5 · answered by maryanndertal 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The law in Iran.
2006-12-30 16:36:00 · answer #6 · answered by ra63 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's the Islamic way of execution (Iraq is an Islamic country)......
2006-12-30 16:37:17 · answer #7 · answered by Peace 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
they wanted something so they can see him suffer from
2006-12-30 16:36:17 · answer #8 · answered by Thrills 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it's their law.
2006-12-30 21:27:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋