Life sentence or execution? Which seems more justice-serving?

Question

This question is definetly born out of the incident that happened today - Saddam's execution.

I was contemplating what the options were for a man as murderous as he was... Wouldn't a life sentence have been a more reasonable way to serve justice? It definely would have been an elongated the suffering of the criminal leader which seems more just than simply killing him; regardless of your religous intake on the situation - that perhaps he will pay the price in the end, or what not - it would seem more apporpriate that a life sentence would have done more justice?

Or should a murderer be killed, following through with the concept of "an eye for an eye"... ?

I don't know what you think, and that's why I am asking you for your opinion. Which, if you had the authority to choose, would you condem as a sentence for the Iraqi leader... a life sentece, or a death sentence (as has been the case...) and what would be the reasons for your choice?

Elaborate as to give a concise answer please.

Answer 1

Well I believe in if let the punishment fit the crime. He thought he would never get challeged or punished for what he did. He thought he was untouchable. His death may finally let some people be at ease. Like all the people who have no Idea where or what happened to the family members. Life sentence just lets him live out his life in peace more than what he did do all those people he killed. Also all the peole that have to live with health complications for the rest off ther life because of weapons he used on them. Plus letting him life would tie up more reasouces in guarding him making sure he was not freed.

Answer 2

Personally I don't consider execution a proper method of
punishment for various reasons. The top reason on that
list always is the question if the verdict is really as waterproof
as it seems. If you do a mistake you cannot excuse for it.
Then you're the murderer. What should we do with people
who execute an innocent? Execute them? That would sound quite
reasonable. And who exactly would you want to execute then?
The prosecutor, the judge and the governor? Maybe even the
president?

There have been cases were people were executed or nearly
executed on false evidence and there always will be. No proof
is waterproof. Not back then and even less today.

With Saddam of course that's not the case. Although his
hasted execution still troubles me. Not because of the
execution or because I oppose death penalty in general.
But because it was unnecessarily hasted. With his death
every chance to dig that whole crap out is buried. Maybe
that was the reason for his swift death.

Answer 3

I do not believe any human being has the right to kill another human being. As far as an eye for an eye...that is for God to handle. God tells us that he will give an eye for an eye. Justice is from God. It is our duty as human beings to do the best we can and live accordingly. It is apparent that prisons do not work. We need to change the way we deal with deviant behavior. The death sentence is the lowest form of humanity. Don't you think it is peculiar that there are animal right activists preventing cruelty to animals and prevent killing of animals yet people seem to celebrate killing of criminals. I am sick to think of the horrible things Saddam has done in his life...however, it also sickens me to see people celebrate a hanging of any man...Even Saddam

Answer 4

I believe each thing you're saying a hundred% yet there have been situations the place harmless human beings went to detention center for against the regulation they did no longer devote. meaning that get right of entry to to an entire spectrum of criminal protection could be allowed besides the undeniable fact that interior the case the place a white guy protests his conviction simply by fact blacks weren't on the jury is BS. it truly is a court docket gadget errors and that could desire to have been pushed aside while it grow to be filed. Judges in all courts are actually not being held to blame simply by fact they, the judges, the prosecutors and the protection criminal experts are all on the chum gadget. human beings could write those watch dogs agencies while they word issues which includes this happening. they are the only degree the typical inhabitants has at their disposal to suited suited injustices by utilising the courts. Motivating human beings to handle a topic like that's like attempting to go a mountain with a spoon. human beings will turn their head and stroll away and not ***** till something quickly impacts them then that's often "how can they do this." Society usually is lazy and unconcerned till something takes place to them. maximum at here look to hate FOX information. FOX information in specific bill O'reilly is the only information employer that do and could go after those pompous assed judges who have faith they have been crowned by utilising the divinity. while FOX has confronted them they visit sh-- simply by fact they don't seem for use to war of words approximately their judgements.

Answer 5

Your question clearly comes from a western view point.

The mid-east nations have always believed that death is the only solution for serious crimes. Always. Once convicted there never ever would have been any other option.

And there are many people put to death there for far less offensive crimes than his.

I am sure they have far less people imprisoned there than we do because of it. Their government would view life imprisonment almost a reward because they would have to support his life.

You must remember that "an eye for an eye" was part of the very reason Jesus came to earth. For he said "you say an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, but I say unto you if your enemy strikes you on one cheek turn the other". Jesus came to bring brotherly love where it was most needed. And it clearly still is.

Answer 6

I;m torn- I would want the life sentance for him so that he has to live with what he did for the rest of his life, i also want the death, because i don't think however long he was in jail he'll ever really be sorry for what he did, I think he deserves the most brutal execution possible

Answer 7

There are many religions & I dont wish to offend anyone by sharing my thoughts. I personally hope someone ministered to & given the opportunity to become a saved christian or born again believer. If he would or could have accepted christ as saviour (maybe he did & we don't know) he could have been given the opportunity to teach christianity to his country as well while serving time in prison.

Answer 8

I think life sentence is CRUELER. It's crueler on the people who must daily be contaminated with the evil...

And I have lived in this theoretical discussion for years.

Answer 9

I think the answer is, "Which scares you more?" A life of confinement which is a postponment of the inevitable or to get it over with? All fear death. Why? Fear of the unknown or is it really the fear of meeting the ultimate judge, your maker?

Answer 10

Let'um rot in jail, then before they get ready to kick the bucket, dismember them slowly&painfully,let them feel the pain they inflicted, Happy new year!