A-You were reasonably careful in hiring Frank and had no reason to suspect the danger he posed.Because you weren't negligent,you can't be held liable for Frank's negligence.
B-You can be held liable for Frank's negligence under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.
C-You can be held liable for Frank's actions under the doctrine of respondeat superior or vicarious liablity.
D-Because Frank had the accident while acting as an employee,only you as his employer---not Frank personally----can be held liable for negligence.
2006-12-30
07:29:15
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics