i believe that no one has the right to take a live ,so i don't agree with his death.we are just teaching childern that it's ok to kill if someone does it first.they could have just left him in jail for live.now the muslims have a other reason to hate us.
2006-12-30 06:08:10 · 15 answers · asked by vetinthemaking 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
I am personally oppsed to a death penalty for anything. But if thats what they do in Iraq, well that is what they do. We have no bussines being over there and we have no say in what or how there Country should be run.
2006-12-30 06:20:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think that he deserved to go to jail! I mean, what a short death? He was like, what... 79 years old? His life was over anyways, why not let him suffer more. I know this sounds kind of evil but I think that he didnt deserve to die such an easy death. And they should put this execution stuff away, it doesnt undo anything. No one comes back to life and he wont regret a thing.
2006-12-30 06:16:30 · answer #2 · answered by Remnants Of Yesterday 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you dont believe in the death penalty, can Charles Manson and his friends come stay at your place?
Get real. There are some very crazy people out there who deserve the death penalty.
Yes, hanging Saddam was just.
Dont speculate on why the muslims hate us. They just hate. Period. Educate yourself or you will be misled.
2006-12-30 06:11:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
it relatively is punctiliously unfair. What employer has canines Bush in overthrowing Saddam from potential and giving him dying sentences on an identical time as he has killed plenty further and extra harmless human beings than Saddam. (on an identical time as saddam killed in basic terms people who have been a threat to his regime)
2016-11-25 01:06:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree with you! I think it's going to defiantly cause more conflicts than we ever had in U.S.A and Britain! They should have just let him rot in prison! Death is not the answer to solve any problem!
2006-12-30 06:25:19 · answer #5 · answered by Lihanna 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would have shot him in his rabbit hole.
What a waste of time and money to go through all this farce of court room battle to achieve the same result.
2006-12-30 06:12:48 · answer #6 · answered by Aussies-Online 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
For horrible crimes then a similar punishment is suitable. His own country tried him in court, sentenced him and executed him for his murders. Some people can be extremely evil and they have to pay for that.
2006-12-30 06:12:45 · answer #7 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm usually for a life sentence over death penalty...don't know how to feel...he was a mass murderer and showed no remorse.
2006-12-30 06:21:11 · answer #8 · answered by Mizz SJG 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, it was fair considering how evil he was. I thought it would take them longer to excecute him though.
2006-12-30 06:19:50 · answer #9 · answered by H 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
YABBA DABBA DOO!
I think it was fair.
he caused so much chaos in the middle east and in Iraq.
2006-12-30 06:10:51 · answer #10 · answered by Cuddly Lez 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋