English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'd like to see Hillary Clinton as our next President.

2006-12-30 06:06:16 · 40 answers · asked by Anton Mathew 5 in Politics & Government Elections

I think even Edith Bunker would be better than what we have now.

2006-12-30 06:20:12 · update #1

Keep in mind that anyone running for President in this country MUST have been born in this Country.

Poloticians only. No Actresses or Entertainers.

2006-12-30 06:25:46 · update #2

40 answers

Face it people, there's no woman (or man) better suited for the job right now than Hillary Clinton, if she even agrees to run, she's not confirmed that yet! Getting her husband (the ex prez) as first man & political advisor (for free) would be a huge plus. Together, they could accomplish more than anyone else I can think of.

2006-12-30 06:34:51 · answer #1 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 6 5

Hillary Clinton. She would have to be a better president than Bill Clinton.Its time that we have a woman for president.

2006-12-30 10:44:42 · answer #2 · answered by Nancy M. 4 · 3 0

In INDIA,President is often First CItizen Of united states. in terms of shape Of INDIA,President has no longer enormous powers as that of PM.President is in simple terms the representative and PM is easily govt power. So if representative communicate undesirable,for sure it will make controversy. In yet another word,President is like ornament On physique.If ornament has began to corrode,it will make experience unhappy.

2016-10-28 18:00:51 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

ok, for one.... anyone who says "i dont know any other female politicians", shouldnt be allowed to answer the question.

two, if you'd take hitler over hillary, you're probably really enjoying the way the current government is trampling over the american people's rights, because this cabinet is the closest thing to the nazis we've ever had.

third, hillary did support the war, but guess what, SO DID EVERYONE ELSE! that was back before we know GW was feeding us lies about Iraq's weapons.

and lastly, what the hell does her husband have to do with anything? hillary has had a long and successful career, unlike GW, who needs his dad's friends to pay for his mistakes.

and who says "barf" anymore? let alone having multiple posts to one answer about politics? i'm willing to wager that one user has multiple screen names so they can vote over and over.

2006-12-30 10:37:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Frankly at this point in time I don't think any of the women are right for the job...I can't vote for Hillary...
Of course, seeing what some of the men have done its a toss up too...lol.....I just don't see my voting for a woman and I am female

2006-12-30 17:04:48 · answer #5 · answered by Gypsygrl 5 · 0 1

its so funny how ppl are judging her political abilities on the fact that her husband ran around on her. call me crazy, but it was his decision to do that stuff, and theres a lot of other ppl out there that have done those things, or stayed with someone who has, and at the end of the day, its still nobody's business and it doesnt affect someone's political abilities.

that all said, i dont think she'd be the best for the job, but after dealing with Curious George W(tf) Bush, there is some part of me that wants to see Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton run together, just to watch the expressions on their faces as a woman and a black man of kenyan descent go into the country.

and for the record, when Bill was in office, we had a huge surplus, the economy was good, and we were in good standing with the world, so as far as i'm concerned what he did with his own penis is his business. he shouldnt have lied about it, but at least he was never a coke head who failed several businesses, or an old man who shoots ppl in the face.

and by the way, Condi is so grossly incompetent its not even funny. she "didnt remember" being at meetings concerning pending terrorist attacks before 911, AND a meeting about the government assistance needed when hurricane karina came, even though both meeting were documented, and she signed the papers. she's the only person in the cabinet that might be dumber than Bush himself.

2006-12-30 06:21:48 · answer #6 · answered by hellion210 6 · 7 5

I do not trust Hillary because she is making a lot of "Repuclican" statements and seemed to be somewhat pro-war. With Hillary it is all about her ego. Condi Rice is smarter than the rest of that group, except for possibly Cheney, and she is probably more moral, but she's too narrowly focused. I could be persuaded to vote for Nancy Pelosi or Barbara Boxer, given the right track records over the next 10 years.

2006-12-30 06:17:01 · answer #7 · answered by Zelda Hunter 7 · 2 6

As one who would support Hillary, it does not surprise me that you would take Edith Bunker over what we have now. I hope that statement was intended as hyperbole, but I suspect not.

A Hillary Clinton presidency would be a disaster for this country in terms of economics, foreign policy, national defense, culture, and social program spending. Perish the thought! Fortunately for those of us who know better, there are an awful lot of people in the US who really dislike Hillary, and she is too liberal to be elected--I hope.

As for the best woman for the job--Condi Rice would not be bad. Unfortunately, most women who gain national political prominence are too liberal to be a good president.

2006-12-30 08:41:10 · answer #8 · answered by sargon 3 · 1 8

Hillary Clintion for president, with Vice President William Jefferson Clinton

2006-12-30 06:08:31 · answer #9 · answered by another detroit bassist 5 · 6 7

Hilary Clinton, hands down!

2006-12-30 07:07:54 · answer #10 · answered by Dita 5 · 5 3

fedest.com, questions and answers