I don't know how many different times I have seen that George Bush should have been hanged today. Instead of, or in some cases with Saddam Hussein.
Saddam Hussein was tried and convicted by his own people. George Bush has not been tried for anything. He hasn't even been accused of any crime in the Congress or a court of law. It is fair to express discourse you feel with the administration, but at what point did the court of public opinion become more important than the actual laws of the land. If you truly believe in the Constitution, as liberals claim they do, then why do you not believe in one of the basic tenets, which is innocent until proven guilty? If the next Congress chooses to bring impeachment then sobeit. If as a result Mr. Bush is found guilty of any articles of impeachment then I will be happy to stand with liberals and demand that justice be done, but until that time all this rhetoric goes against the very concepts you accuse the president of violating.
2006-12-30 05:10:51 · 8 answers · asked by Bryan 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Lzyxoxo: A valid point.
2006-12-30 05:35:05 · update #1
people shouldn't say we should hang the pres. that's just rash anger speaking.
I'm against the death penalty, so I wouldn't want bush executed nor did I want saddam hanged
2006-12-30 09:30:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What about the rhetoric in 2003 which brought Saddam to the gallows in the first place? George Bush judged and convicted him, and the war was just a way to get him into custody. He wasn't hanged for WMDs, involvement in 9/11, or any of the other excuses that were used.
For those who support the Constitution, the entire Administration and the Congress (Republicans and Democrats alike) should have been impeached. The President usurped congressional powers and the Congress abrogated its responsibility to check that action. The one is guilty of malfeasance, while the other is guilty of negligence.
2006-12-30 05:22:03 · answer #2 · answered by normobrian 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that George Bush should be hung.. and it is absurd to say so.
But who says all those people who have been posting those absurd questions have been liberals. You are just assuming that only liberals would do such a thing...
Bush currently has a 30% approval rating and more than 30% of people in this country are conservative. Some conservatives are quite upset with Bush's handling of the war and they may be even more upset about it than liberals because it somewhat tarnishes the image of conservatives.
2006-12-30 05:20:02 · answer #3 · answered by Lzyxoxo 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Richey does no longer be out till there replaced right into a extreme miscarriage of justice.That being the case he don't have been in penal complex.it incredibly is that straightforward.He did no longer dedicate homicide. the persons investigating the crime are those at fault right here.A fact borne out by employing his launch.
2016-10-06 05:23:50 · answer #4 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Couldn't have said it better myself.
In the not too distant past, saying something like "Bush should hang with Saddam" would be considered treasonous by our government.
I still find it to be treason to call for the death of our president.
2006-12-30 05:13:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yea, liberals are sort of stupid. They don't really think the whole process out. They'll make a decision and expect it to work without any regard to the effect it has in other areas.
2006-12-30 05:17:02 · answer #6 · answered by Benjovi 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Exactly, good question!
2006-12-30 05:14:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
AMEN!
2006-12-30 08:19:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋