your views please!
2006-12-30 05:04:58 · 9 answers · asked by I am not afraid!! 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. LET GOD BE THE JUDGE NOT YOU. He is a human being like US Regardless of what he did.I believe in the spirit of forgiveness. Peace to the world.That not going to happen. As I'm typing right now, more people are being blown up. YEAH peace indeed. While he was on trial, did the situation change? Are the corpses of the dead ones gonna come back? It's not going to change anything. Many Iraqi's are gonna die along not us in the west. Suicide bombers and loyalist are going to revenge killing scores of people . So what's the point? Why must more people die because of this man? NOBODY ! NOBODY should be treated (dehumanized by hanging)like that for whatsoever reason. LET GOD BE THE JUDGE
2006-12-30 05:08:43 · answer #1 · answered by Agentj100 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Being a Christian "an eye for an eye" is my opinion, HOWEVER, I personnaly feel death was too easy. The tourture he inflicted on his victums (men, women, children) was so great, he should have (in my opinion) been delt with in the same manner. Take a power screw driver to his leg, see how he likes it. Make him suffer alittle.
It is like a child abuser, lock the worthless SOB in a cage with a mean angry, hungry gorilla and let him see how it feels.
***This is just my opinion on the matter, but I think Justice was served in a soft manner, unlike the brutality he deserved.
2006-12-30 05:15:08 · answer #2 · answered by Chasity 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
By rushing to execute Sadaam, the Iraqi government has actually denied justice to many of his likely victims. They will not get the chance to have their stories told in the courts. At his death, Sadaam was on trial for crimes against Kurdish people. Don't they have a right to be heard??
2006-12-30 06:48:39 · answer #3 · answered by Susan S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
forget approximately for a 2nd that we are speaking Saddam. how are you able to state which you're usually against the loss of life penalty, yet for this reason it truly is optimal? you're maximum incredibly entitled on your opinion, and that i admire that, I do exactly no longer realize it. You the two have faith that the loss of life penalty is a suitable punishment for specific crimes, or you have faith that that's incorrect to take the existence of yet another person as punishment. If one guy or woman is got here across answerable for killing one guy or woman and yet another is got here across answerable for killing a million human beings it makes a distinction interior the utility of the loss of life penalty? I do exactly no longer see it. As for Saddam, now you sound like GW. enable's placed him to loss of life for what he could desire to do to retaliate if he's freed? i do no longer see that the two. for my section, i think of the loss of life penalty is suited to Saddam and may be able to arise with a itemizing of convicted murders that could desire to go with him.
2016-10-28 17:55:13 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that Saddam being hung was VERY justified. After all those people that he killed??
2006-12-30 05:15:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because he killed many innocent people. He had a trial, and he had the opportunity to call witnesses, which is more than he gave his victims.
2006-12-30 05:13:43 · answer #6 · answered by Tony M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
After being convicted of multiple murders, sentenced to death and executed by his own country then what they deem correct is what we have to follow.
2006-12-30 05:11:50 · answer #7 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not justified. Those who killed him did just as bas as they claim he did. Whether they were responsible for the death of one or hundreds, they are murderers!
2006-12-30 05:09:24 · answer #8 · answered by adiahudo 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
justified because he killed many many people and those people and there famlies deserve justice and closer.
2006-12-30 05:08:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋