2006-12-30 04:31:05 · 7 answers · asked by dyingfetus612 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Ziggy mey pezuvek.
If you had left off the "jihad" nonsense and used an avatar of something other than a piece of porcine excrement, people might take your question seriously.
As it is you have stepped on your own wobbley bits.
2006-12-30 04:37:41 · answer #1 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
saddam may deserve his wrong doing. but the question is how about Bush and Blair. for what reason they invaded iraq nobody still dont know. nearly 600,000 iraqi civilians killed (as media indicated)
why these kind of cruelty.
common.. know about ahimsa the word the world must know
mahatma gandhi did - the whole india and pakistan and bangladesh region got freedom from british colonization without bloodshed without gun shout
you can do, i can do,, anybody can do
2006-12-30 12:47:42 · answer #2 · answered by vava 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The punishment (and those giving it) should set an example by not being as brutal as the crime being punished.
2006-12-30 12:34:20 · answer #3 · answered by fjpoblam 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Even if he does deserves to be hanged, are the corpses gonna come back to live?
2006-12-30 12:34:19 · answer #4 · answered by Agentj100 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i don`t think anyone should be hung.we are not god,only he has the right to take someone`s life
2006-12-30 12:33:49 · answer #5 · answered by lily 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i wonder on this. while saddam was evil he was president when he killed people for the trial. bush has killed thousands of both iraqis and US military for what we have found now is no reason. will he be placed in trial? i do not wish it but i wonder what the difference is?
2006-12-30 12:34:36 · answer #6 · answered by Little anionyx 3 · 5⤊ 4⤋
hell no.....
2006-12-30 12:32:25 · answer #7 · answered by takeemout01 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋