English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does anyone agree that it is unfair to the American public to make us sit and suffer through the most annoying commerical? Isn't it worth boycotting the product?

2006-12-30 04:24:42 · 21 answers · asked by John 2 in Entertainment & Music Television

21 answers

I Hate that commercial. Its annoying enough to make me not buy the product!

The reason they have it is because studies show that you need to hear something 3 times to remember it. Thats why they repeat it 3 times. Seems like it worked, right!??

2006-12-30 04:29:30 · answer #1 · answered by Kylie 2 · 0 0

The commercial is sooooo stupid and annoying that everyone is talking about "Head-On." This is exactly the point of the marketing technique.

Here is something for you all to think about...
Head-On is not FDA approved, so the makers can not claim that it helps head aches. They just mention over and over and over..."Head-On apply directly to the forehead."

They make no claim at all that it will do anything once you "apply it directly to the forehead."

Kudos to them for excellent marketing...kinda like Golden Palace Casino using big purchases on eBay to circumvent US advertising laws!!!

Marketing is so awesome!!

2006-12-30 12:30:27 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. G 6 · 0 0

The Product Walks the Walk. Eventhough, we Don't Like the Talk!

2006-12-30 12:27:29 · answer #3 · answered by kayboff 7 · 0 0

I rarely watch commercials. I usually tune into something else until my show comes back on. I have watched that one. The people on it cannot act. Take a chill pill. Just turn the channel when it comes on. By the way, they show it for the MONEY!!

2006-12-30 12:29:30 · answer #4 · answered by robee 7 · 1 0

The idea is to get people to talk about it. They admit it is annoying in another commercial. You are giving them a free ad by asking your question.

2006-12-30 12:27:21 · answer #5 · answered by Barkley Hound 7 · 0 0

why because they pay alot of money to the tv stations to show it and the tv stations aren't go to say no to income, would you? whats worse and more annoying then the commercial is that the product is actually worthless.

2006-12-30 12:27:14 · answer #6 · answered by kewtber 3 · 0 0

Head On, aplly directly to the forehead. I like how they have head on commercials saying how annoying the head on commercials are.

2006-12-30 12:40:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have no idea. I hate that commercial because it gives me a damn headache to watch it. Perhaps that's why they choose that! Regardless of my headache, I would rather take an actual horse whipping than to buy their stupid product.

2006-12-30 12:28:52 · answer #8 · answered by BROWNITE 4-ever 6 · 1 0

yes, it's so freaking a** annoying and it's a retarded commerical too. those people really need to grow up and just use their brains more often but they can't cause they are probably brain damaged.

2006-12-30 12:51:36 · answer #9 · answered by dmt479 5 · 1 0

Why do they allow the Gieco cave man commercial? It is more annoying than that one and gets stupider and stupider everytime they do it.

2006-12-30 12:55:29 · answer #10 · answered by no.#1 Mom 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers