what is the difference between,Saddam, bush, Blair, other countries leaders & terrorists?

Question

no matter what the method, people have all died at their hands, how is it that some are punished and others walk free.

Answer 1

Not much difference between them when violence is used to determine other people's destiny against their will.
Peace & harmony

Answer 2

it truly is been shown previous any doubt, that Iraq management grow to be FINANCING terrorism by way of their oil earnings. some traced to Ben encumbered and different terrorist agencies. Any united states that helps the killing of voters, even of their very own territories, as Iraq did, actual grow to be a piece of the photograph of terror. for the time of any of our international wars, a rustic might declare conflict on any they got here across helping their enemy! In our day and age, that's honestly some Muslims who recommend that every physique that isn't of their faith could die. there is likewise data that Iran is and has been helping terrorism by way of funds or maybe some Liberals reported looking after that difficulty! that's stunning as maximum Liberals are against any Republican President on any conflict project! They make all a play for a vote and for politics no be counted if the country or our human beings will go through for it. we could desire to signify that they are not even American for some! So we can not call Bush a terrorists while he's making an attempt to give up it.. We could endure in innovations, that's international and various countries have suffered from murders and kidnappings from those animals...Earl

Answer 3

Bush and Blair are seeking justice, at least that is the intention. Saddam, according to evidence butchered women and children, old people and young without regard to respect for life.
Terrorists are, again we are told, and some who have lost loved ones to terrorist attacks will undoubtedly reflect, that terrorists are the enemies of freedom.
To kill in an act of war, or to inflict capital punishment (that is by order of a legitimate court, backed by a legitimate country) is considered not murder, but justifiable killing.
That is the best way I know to explain it without getting into complicated legal terminology.
--That Cheeky Lad

Answer 4

Saddam was a dictator that pretty much took over his country. Bush was elected to office, and thumbs down to those who did vote for him, but that is your right.
The people that join the military know that there is a chance that they may be forced to fight in a war, and may never return.
I don't believe that this war is worth fighting for and that our military was misled and should not be loosing their lives over this.
I don't know if I have answered your question, but we are a democracy and we do have a choice in the say of who runs our country, whether we choose to exercise that right or not.

Answer 5

Bush, Blair, and others speak English an have the power in their hands, the common with Saddam is, all of them are criminals.

Answer 6

The real difference is point of view, that and some are the winners and others are not so the winners get to say who lives and who dies.

Answer 7

There is really very little difference. But I truly believe that people in the United States are afraid of their government.

Answer 8

ones mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter..... saddam was a wrong'un but the governments and media decide which is which ... not so long ago we funded iraq & afghanistan for variouse reasons...go figure!

Answer 9

That's the name of the game. Don't think you would be any different if given power.

Answer 10

I agree, Bush should be hung too