It appears that Iraq hanged Hussein for crimes on humanity on what appears to be just under 200 people (folks there is more but this is what he was tried on), but shouldn't we try Mr. Bush for the many innocent lives that have been lost under him while being Commander in Chief these soldiers and civilians have been killed with yet no apparent explanation, somewhat like Hussein's victims, see the pattern. (duh lets see W.O.M!! nope, duh Hussein!! nope he is gone, duh Just because I can, Yess!!!)
we will see.
2006-12-30 04:07:07 · 14 answers · asked by carlos s 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Shouldn't we try everyone on the planet who has ever done something wrong? Shouldn't we all stand before a righteous judge to be tried for everything we have done wrong??
2006-12-30 04:10:47 · answer #1 · answered by Kitty McSnappypants 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
the whole thing is the top of hypocrisy... i feel like vomiting when i see those faces... judge...my A$$...
if they would at least continue that way, but then they'd have to hang 99% of all ruling, dictating, or what so ever people. I'd start of course with the worlds sweet hart Georgy W.B. Then move to Putin, who is giving a **** about the world, even at least to cover his dictatorship. Over Europe, to Asia, to America from North to south, to Africa...hoj hoj hoj....Australia... probably the one left percent would be the Government of Iceland....
And apropos Saddam Hussein was a dictator, for sure. He killed a lot of people, yes. And those left, ah so free people now, are killing each other now for power... beside the US force. Maybe some places, countries need a monster to control them...?! Besides, it was Saddam, who has given the rights to the women, and has made school a must for every child... and so on.
every coin has two sides.
2006-12-30 12:40:01 · answer #2 · answered by zaraza 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Carlos, that question is asked on here every five minutes. Literally.
History will come to show Bush was right for going to Iraq. Time after time, all throughout history, it's the same story. An American leader took action, everyone called him a jerk, and then it came out that he was justified. Not one attack on American property in over five years. In the Clinton era, there was an attack every six months. I don't think that's a coincidence.
2006-12-30 12:12:11 · answer #3 · answered by cirque de lune 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How many times is this question going to be on? No matter how angry you are, Carlos, it's not gonna happen. Go try to put our President through court, you won't get within a hundred feet of him. Get a life and be happy you can talk so openly about Bush, try living in Venezuela and talking this kind of thing about Hugo Chavez. Or living life the way Saddam had Irakis living it, starving to death while he feasted in a palace surrounded with more gold than your broke self will ever have the chance to lay eyes on.
Just shut up.
2006-12-30 12:14:04 · answer #4 · answered by guicho79 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Are you serious or just stupid?
Saddam seized power (not elected) and murdered millions of civilians(not soldiers) over the course of HIS DICTATORSHIP!
Regardless of your ideology, our President is an elected official.
The men and women who have given their lives for their country were soldiers. My father was a soldier for 30 years. Soldiers sign up FOR WAR to protect ingrates like you, and maintain the freedoms you have in America to say stupid stuff like your question here! If you don't like it here go live in another country and see how great it is. Have you ever traveled outside the US? Many places are really poor and very expensive with few commodities to buy and dirty and more corrupt than you can imagine. Nothing like the lap of luxury you live in in this wonderful country. President Bush is a strong, decisive leader who is smart enough to have become President of the most powerful country in the world.
What have you accomplished?
2006-12-30 12:17:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Geroge Washington
2006-12-30 12:08:13 · answer #6 · answered by Nicole 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No dear, we won't be doing that. Considering Saddam killed people for voicing their opinions and you know, basically just breathing wrong and Bush isn't doing that, no, I don't think that's an option at this point. Your suggestion is noted though and will be put in the Big Old Box Of What You Think We Should Do. Keep those suggestions coming! Your vote counts!
2006-12-30 12:12:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
It should be Bush.
I figure the timing of his execution is somehow connected to his other trail for having the Kurds gassed, which will never be brought into public scrutiny. It makes you wonder if the execution was meant to bury Saddam and any evidence again the Neocons for supplying the ways and means of constructing chemical weapons.
2006-12-30 12:13:20 · answer #8 · answered by frozen13245 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
George Bush Jr. should be tried and executed for his false war. He has put thousands of Americans to their deaths along with many thousands more Iraqui civilians and some British troops as well.
He has all but admitted the Iraqui war was a failure and he should be punished for his incompetence and psychotic behaivior. "God" told him to go to war... yeah whatever nutcase!!
2006-12-30 12:11:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't know who is next but I wish it was bush and then Osama bin laden coz bush thinks he is something and Laden coz of the way his supporters kill ppl by cutting they're head and body into peices...
I actually wish nobody gets killed I wish they are given Lifetime imprisonment coz thats more painful than Death.
2006-12-30 12:12:45 · answer #10 · answered by Serah 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋