I'm 40 and I still consider 25 year olds as Kids. So It depends on the Age of the person making the statement,
2006-12-30 04:01:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ironman396 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
while they call a participant a "pink-shirt" it potential that they have been on the team, yet by no potential performed in a game for one in all some motives. First the coach would possibly no longer experience like the participant is able to play are that time and can want one extra 12 months to stand as much as that time. 2nd the participant might desire to have had medical issues that stored him from enjoying. and finally the coach might desire to have a appropriate notch recruit at a place yet has a great participant there, so he supplies him a "pink shirt." yet to be blunt the "pink-shirt" potential that that participant have been part of the team yet no longer performed in a game, yet does not lose a 12 months of NCAA eligibility, letting them have all 4 years of eligibility.
2016-12-31 07:45:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
18 is a legal requirment, not a definition. Kids these days are taking longer to grow up... Hence statements like 30's the new 20... Or magazine articles about kids taking longer to move out of their parent's houses...
2006-12-30 04:04:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by quintstevenson 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its also a term of endearment. "kid" is not necessarily a negative term, but just a reminder that they're starting out in their career & they are, after all, playing a game.
2006-12-30 04:16:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by thewhexican 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is because they are young and unexperienced in their sport. They also call rookies and younger players, as well as minor leaguers kids.
2006-12-30 04:02:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by d75train 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
because they are young and inexperienced in the world. just because you are 18 doesn't mean you are a sophisticated adult, just a legal one.
2006-12-30 04:10:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by momoftrl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋