English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

To stabilize the area. The fact that he became a facist who beat, murdered and tortured his country was not something that any human being should accept. I guess you would have been yelling in nurenberg also as that woudl not have been a fair trial. The fact we would give him a trial when the Iraquis would just kill him is somehting you seem to not value. I suggest you move there, because it appears you don't value what America offers.

2006-12-30 03:25:03 · answer #1 · answered by Cy Gold 4 · 1 0

nicely Les, I don"t see how he can ever have a honest trial, yet in spite of this why would desire to he have an ordeal, he"s as to blame as hell. Ask the Kurds, ask any of the kinfolk of the human beings he had dragged out, tortured and shot. It"s in basic terms a waste of time, funds and attempt. Take him into the courtyard and characteristic him shot. end of project.

2016-12-15 11:33:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no it wasn`t. Saddam was a torturer before the US helped him into power (that was his job )The US and UK knew what he was doing with the weapons they sold him but they turned a blind eye this is history and easy to find out .
What the US expected was for him to tow the line over policies that suited them and over oil . America didn`t like it when he stopped fitting into their idea of things .And he had to be killed because he knew to much

2006-12-30 06:09:30 · answer #3 · answered by keny 6 · 1 1

i don't think the USA were expecting saddam to murder innocent men women and children-for this crime the beast has been slain. he was an evil ba**ard and if there is any justice in this world he will be sharing a pit with his freind adolf hitler.

2006-12-30 03:32:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

We helped him for a time because he hated Iran and so did we.

What we didn't expect for him was the brutality he exhibited. Saddam got a fair trial. Get over it.

2006-12-30 03:23:52 · answer #5 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 4 3

Try to not be so naive about world affairs, please.

We do not control the world. But if we have an opportunity to bring about any peace, we have to use what we've got.

2006-12-30 03:44:57 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 1 0

No we did NOT help Saddam, we used him to HURT the Ayatollah Khomeini... our arch enemy of those years... get it right.

2006-12-30 03:58:49 · answer #7 · answered by Gunny T 6 · 1 0

This trial was not fair.

Bush and Blair expected Saddam to expose their dirty deals with him that was why the rush execution.

2006-12-30 03:26:33 · answer #8 · answered by st.abbs 5 · 1 3

Stop it you foolish liberal! The USA had nothing to do with his trial, his sentence, his execution. He was a war criminal tried in his own country brought to justice by his own people.

2006-12-30 03:26:42 · answer #9 · answered by Brianne 7 · 1 2

well it wasnt tyranny,we helped give him the power,he perverted it,we didnt tell him to make the choices he made,he got too big for himself,plus we didnt try him,his own people did,yell at them

2006-12-30 03:26:30 · answer #10 · answered by stygianwolfe 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers