The "smoke" is no more toxic than "oak" (no poetry pun intended)
The issue is to determine the burning properties in the definition of it being a "hard" or "soft" wood.
IE: Pine, such as chopping up your Christmas tree for a nice New Years Eve fire, would leave more residue than a seasoned hardwood, in the form of sap, etc.
BTW, in my opinion no "green" wood should be burned anyway.
I've been on this planet a long time, and with no offense at all, I'm recalling an ancient childhood lyrical poem/song, "All around the Mulberry Bush" is part of it. I was also a farmer for many years, but plead ignorant to the Mulberry being a "Tree" Perhaps someone can enlighten me?
In any case, fire turns everything to "ASH" ( again, no pun. Ash is a beautiful "wood"), and in doing so leaves the residues to be cleaned up.
Steven Wolf
(The Rev.)
2006-12-30 02:17:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by DIY Doc 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mulberry is a soft wood and will burn hot and fast. It creates a lot of creosote in the chimney. Doesn't smell as pleasant as some other wood when burning.
2006-12-30 01:47:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by yancychipper 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure but it is usually a trash tree, with small branches and would burn fast.
2006-12-30 01:42:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by redunicorn 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
its ok just dosent throw out much heat
2006-12-30 02:36:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by wildrice64 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-12-30 01:42:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Colleen 1
·
0⤊
0⤋