English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-30 01:35:23 · 5 answers · asked by kfrank4094@sbcglobal.net 1 in Home & Garden Maintenance & Repairs

5 answers

The "smoke" is no more toxic than "oak" (no poetry pun intended)

The issue is to determine the burning properties in the definition of it being a "hard" or "soft" wood.

IE: Pine, such as chopping up your Christmas tree for a nice New Years Eve fire, would leave more residue than a seasoned hardwood, in the form of sap, etc.
BTW, in my opinion no "green" wood should be burned anyway.

I've been on this planet a long time, and with no offense at all, I'm recalling an ancient childhood lyrical poem/song, "All around the Mulberry Bush" is part of it. I was also a farmer for many years, but plead ignorant to the Mulberry being a "Tree" Perhaps someone can enlighten me?

In any case, fire turns everything to "ASH" ( again, no pun. Ash is a beautiful "wood"), and in doing so leaves the residues to be cleaned up.

Steven Wolf
(The Rev.)

2006-12-30 02:17:33 · answer #1 · answered by DIY Doc 7 · 0 0

Mulberry is a soft wood and will burn hot and fast. It creates a lot of creosote in the chimney. Doesn't smell as pleasant as some other wood when burning.

2006-12-30 01:47:05 · answer #2 · answered by yancychipper 6 · 0 0

Sure but it is usually a trash tree, with small branches and would burn fast.

2006-12-30 01:42:59 · answer #3 · answered by redunicorn 7 · 0 0

its ok just dosent throw out much heat

2006-12-30 02:36:15 · answer #4 · answered by wildrice64 4 · 0 0

yes

2006-12-30 01:42:43 · answer #5 · answered by Colleen 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers